Literature DB >> 1583043

The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders.

J P Iannotti1, J P Gabriel, S L Schneck, B G Evans, S Misra.   

Abstract

We measured the dimensions of the humeral and glenoid articular surfaces in 140 shoulders that were representative of a given population of patients, and also evaluated several glenohumeral relationships. Ninety-six measurements were made in the shoulders of cadavera and forty-four, on magnetic resonance-imaging studies of living patients. Eighty-five per cent of the humeral measurements fell within eight fixed combinations of the radius of curvature and the thickness of the humeral head, in two-millimeter increments. The average radius of curvature of the humeral head in the coronal plane was 24 +/- 2.1 millimeters (range, nineteen to twenty-eight millimeters). The average thickness of the humeral head was 19 +/- 2.4 millimeters (range, fifteen to twenty-four millimeters). There was a wide variability in the size of the humeral head and a direct correlation between the differences in size and the heights in both men and women. The humeral articular surface was spherical in the center; however, the peripheral radius was two millimeters less in the axial plane than in the coronal plane. Thus, the peripheral contour of the articular surface was elliptical (ratio, 0.92). The radius of curvature of the glenoid, measured in the coronal plane, was an average of 2.3 +/- 0.2 millimeters greater than that of the humeral head. The average dimensions of the glenoid in the superior-inferior and anterior-posterior (lower half) directions were 39 +/- 3.5 millimeters (range, thirty to forty-eight millimeters) and 29 +/- 3.2 millimeters (range, twenty-one to thirty-five millimeters). The anterior-posterior dimension of the glenoid was pear-shaped, the lower half being larger than the top half. The ratio of the lower half to the top half was 1:0.80 +/- 0.01. There was a strong linear correlation between the lateral humeral offset and the size of the humeral head (radius of curvature and thickness). The average lateral humeral offset was 56 +/- 5.7 millimeters (range, forty-three to sixty-seven millimeters). The superior most point on the humeral articular surface was an average of 8 +/- 3.2 millimeters (range, three to twenty millimeters) cephalad to the top of the greater tuberosity. Our data show that reconstruction of the lateral humeral offset is important in optimization of the moment arm of the deltoid and rotator cuff and of the normal tension of the soft tissue after prosthetic reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1583043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  87 in total

1.  About the variability of the shape of the glenoid cavity.

Authors:  L F De Wilde; B M Berghs; E Audenaert; G Sys; G O Van Maele; E Barbaix
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Variability of medial and posterior offset in patients with fourth-generation stemmed shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ulrich Irlenbusch; Alexander Berth; Georges Blatter; Peter Zenz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Bony avulsions of the rotator cuff : Arthroscopic concepts].

Authors:  S Greiner; M Scheibel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Does an increase in modularity improve the outcomes of total shoulder replacement? Comparison across design generations.

Authors:  Bradley Schoch; Jean-David Werthel; Cathy Schleck; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Geometrical analysis of stemless shoulder arthroplasty: a radiological study of seventy TESS total shoulder prostheses.

Authors:  Bakir Kadum; Hamid Hassany; Mats Wadsten; Arkan Sayed-Noor; Göran Sjödén
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [Shoulder Arthroplasty. Surgical management].

Authors:  P Habermeyer; S Lichtenberg; P Magosch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Validation of a new model-based tracking technique for measuring three-dimensional, in vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics.

Authors:  Michael J Bey; Roger Zauel; Stephanie K Brock; Scott Tashman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Pinning technique for shoulder fractures in adolescents: computer modelling of percutaneous pinning of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Ramin Mehin; Afshin Mehin; David Wickham; Merv Letts
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Clinical and radiographic mid-term outcomes after shoulder resurfacing in patients aged 50 years old or younger.

Authors:  G Merolla; P Bianchi; N Lollino; R Rossi; P Paladini; G Porcellini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-04-16

10.  [Glenohumeral arthrolysis of the osteoarthritic shoulder in anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty].

Authors:  T Smith; M F Pastor; A Gettmann; M Wellmann; M Struck
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 1.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.