Literature DB >> 15828988

The correlation of the Narcotrend Index and classical electroencephalographic parameters with endtidal desflurane concentrations and hemodynamic parameters in different age groups.

Frank Weber1, Michael Gruber, Kai Taeger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Narcotrend Index (NI) for assessment of depth of anesthesia by analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG), is potentially a pharmacodynamic measure of the effects of desflurane on the brain.
METHODS: In this prospective study of 30 pediatric and adult patients (group 1: 3-6 years, n = 10; group 2: > 6 < 12 years; group 3: 12-40 years), undergoing ophthalmological surgery, we investigated the pharmacodynamic relationship between nonsteady state endtidal desflurane concentrations (eT(Des)), NI, classical EEG parameters (cEEG), heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP). The performance of the Narcotrend for differentiation between consciousness and unconsciousness was evaluated using prediction probability (P(K)).
RESULTS: Spearman correlation analysis showed significant negative correlations (P < 0.001) between eT(Des) and NI (group 1: r = -0.93, group 2: r = -0.86, group 3: r = -0.66). Correlations between eT(Des) and MAP or HR were either only weak negative (r < -0.5) or not significant. Desflurane EC(50) (eT(Des) with half maximal effect on NI) was 7.18% for group 1, 7.34% for group 2, and 4.15% for group 3 (P < 0.001 Vs groups 1 and 2). Overall awake NI values (96.7 +/- 1.4) were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than at the moment of loss of consciousness (58.3 +/- 17.5), with no overlap (P(K) 1.0), whereas P(K) values for cEEG, MAP and HR were all <0.85.
CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacodynamic relationship between eT(Des) and NI is age dependent with a significantly higher EC(50) in children than in adolescents and adults. The NI appears to be superior to cEEG, MAP and HR in differentiating consciousness from unconsciousness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15828988     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01465.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  4 in total

Review 1.  Using EEG to monitor anesthesia drug effects during surgery.

Authors:  Leslie C Jameson; Tod B Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  [Measurement of the depth of anaesthesia].

Authors:  G N Schmidt; J Müller; P Bischoff
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Comparison of Narcotrend Index, Bispectral Index, spectral and entropy parameters during induction of propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia.

Authors:  Arthur Schultz; Markus Siedenberg; Ulrich Grouven; Thomas Kneif; Barbara Schultz
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Monitoring the depth of anaesthesia.

Authors:  Bojan Musizza; Samo Ribaric
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.