Literature DB >> 15827776

Axillary recurrence after sentinel node biopsy.

Jacqueline Sara Jeruss1, David J Winchester, Stephen F Sener, Erika M Brinkmann, Malcolm M Bilimoria, Ermilo Barrera, Eihab Alwawi, Angel Nickolov, G M Schermerhorn, David J Winchester.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has evolved as the standard of care in the surgical staging of breast cancer. This technique is accurate for surgical staging of axillary nodal disease. We hypothesized that axillary recurrence after SNB is rare and that SNB may provide regional control in patients with microscopic nodal involvement.
METHODS: With institutional review board approval, SNB was performed with peritumoral injection of 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid. From 1996 to 2003, 1167 patients were entered into a prospective cancer database after surgical therapy; 916 patients consented to long-term follow-up. Fifty-two patients (5.7%) did not map successfully and were excluded, leading to a study population of 864 patients. The median follow-up was 27.4 months (range, 1-98 months).
RESULTS: The median number of sentinel nodes harvested was 2, and 633 (73%) patients had negative sentinel nodes. Thirty (4.7%) of those sentinel node-negative patients underwent completion axillary dissection, whereas 592 (94%) patients were followed up with observation. A total of 231 (27%) had positive sentinel nodes: 158 (68%) of these patients underwent completion axillary dissection, and 73 (32%) were managed with observation alone. Two (.32%) patients who were sentinel node negative had an axillary recurrence; one of these patients had undergone completion axillary dissection. No patient in the observed sentinel node-positive group had an axillary recurrence (odds ratio, .37; P = .725).
CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of a median follow-up of 27.4 months, axillary recurrence after SNB is extraordinarily rare regardless of nodal involvement, thus indicating that this technique provides an accurate measure of axillary disease and may impart regional control for patients with node-positive disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15827776     DOI: 10.1007/s10434-004-1164-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  21 in total

1.  Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Lisa A Newman
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  A declining rate of completion axillary dissection in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients is associated with the use of a multivariate nomogram.

Authors:  Julia Park; Jane V Fey; Arpana M Naik; Patrick I Borgen; Kimberly J Van Zee; Hiram S Cody
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Axillary lymph node dissection for sentinel lymph node micrometastases may be safely omitted in early-stage breast cancer patients: long-term outcomes of a prospective study.

Authors:  Igor Langer; Ulrich Guller; Carsten T Viehl; Holger Moch; Edward Wight; Felix Harder; Daniel Oertli; Markus Zuber
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-08-07

4.  Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial.

Authors:  Armando E Giuliano; Linda McCall; Peter Beitsch; Pat W Whitworth; Peter Blumencranz; A Marilyn Leitch; Sukamal Saha; Kelly K Hunt; Monica Morrow; Karla Ballman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  New trends in breast cancer surgery: a therapeutic approach increasingly efficacy and respectful of the patient.

Authors:  G Franceschini; A Martin Sanchez; A Di Leone; S Magno; F Moschella; C Accetta; R Masetti
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

6.  The role of National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center status: observed variation in surgical care depends on the level of evidence.

Authors:  Haejin In; Bridget A Neville; Stuart R Lipsitz; Katherine A Corso; Jane C Weeks; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Questioning the role of axillary node dissection in sentinel node positive early stage breast cancer in the South Eastern Cancer Centre.

Authors:  O O Mohamed; P M Neary; C Fiuza-Castineira; G T O'Donoghue
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Sentinel node identification rate and nodal involvement in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS trial.

Authors:  Marieke E Straver; Philip Meijnen; Geertjan van Tienhoven; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Robert E Mansel; Jan Bogaerts; Nicole Duez; Luigi Cataliotti; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Helen A Westenberg; Huub van der Mijle; Marko Snoj; Coen Hurkmans; Emiel J T Rutgers
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Predicting Non-sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in a Chinese Breast Cancer Population with 1-2 Positive Sentinel Nodes: Development and Assessment of a New Predictive Nomogram.

Authors:  Jia-ying Chen; Jia-jian Chen; Jing-yan Xue; Ying Chen; Guang-yu Liu; Qi-xia Han; Wen-tao Yang; Zhen-zhou Shen; Zhi-min Shao; Jiong Wu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Factors predicting additional disease in the axilla in patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jacqueline S Jeruss; Lisa A Newman; Gregory D Ayers; Massimo Cristofanilli; Kristine R Broglio; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Min Yi; Jennifer F Waljee; Merrick I Ross; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.