Literature DB >> 15827775

Axillary recurrence after a negative sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer: incidence and clinical significance.

Marjolein L Smidt1, Caroline M M Janssen, Deborah M Kuster, Erik D M Bruggink, Luc J A Strobbe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) carries the inherent risk of approximately 5% false-negative sampling. Undetected tumor-positive nodes of clinical importance are those that lead to axillary recurrence. This survey aims at clarifying the extent of this problem in current practice and literature.
METHODS: In a regional teaching hospital, 696 consecutive breast cancer patients underwent SLNB between January 1998 and July 2003, and data were entered in a prospective database. PubMed and the Cochrane library were searched for a systematic review of the literature. Thirteen studies dealt with the follow-up of a cohort of sentinel lymph node (SLN)-negative patients or presented a case report.
RESULTS: The SLN identification rate was 97.1%. The SLN was tumor free in 439 (65%) of the 676 patients. After a median follow-up of 26 months, axillary recurrence was detected in 2 of 439 patients 4 and 27 months after the SLNB. The incidence of clinically apparent false-negative SLNB is .46%. The systematic review resulted in 3184 SLNB-negative patients with a median follow-up of 25 months. Axillary recurrence occurred in eight patients after a median of 21 months. The axillary recurrence rate in the literature is .25%. One third of these patients present with synchronous systemic metastases.
CONCLUSIONS: Axillary recurrences after a negative SLNB occur, but at a much lower rate than would be expected on the basis of historical figures and the false-negative SLN findings. The natural history of axillary relapse after negative SLNB resembles the locoregional recurrence of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15827775     DOI: 10.1007/s10434-004-1166-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of immunohistochemistry with conventional histopathology for evaluation of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer.

Authors:  Rahul Khanna; Shilpi Bhadani; Seema Khanna; Manoj Pandey; Mohan Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Lisa A Newman
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Manual Lymphatic Drainage after Subepidermal Tracer Injection Optimizes Results of Sentinel Lymph Node Labeling in Primary Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Martin Sillem; Urban Bromberger; Barbara Heitzelmann; Wolfgang J Brauer; Martin Werner; Sylvia Timme
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  Sentinel node biopsy and axillary dissection in breast cancer: the evidence and its limits.

Authors:  Wolfgang Janni; Thorsten Kühn; Lukas Schwentner; Rolf Kreienberg; Tanja Fehm; Achim Wöckel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Breast Cancer: Comparison of Peritumoral and Periareolar Injection.

Authors:  T Rosenow; C Biedendieck; H Fricke; M Brinkmann; U Cirkel; W-D Reinbold; E Fricke
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Re-evaluation of axillary skip metastases in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Mehmet Keskek; Sener Balas; Aytac Gokoz; Iskender Sayek
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006-12-25       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Viviana Galimberti; Bernard F Cole; Stefano Zurrida; Giuseppe Viale; Alberto Luini; Paolo Veronesi; Paola Baratella; Camelia Chifu; Manuela Sargenti; Mattia Intra; Oreste Gentilini; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Giovanni Mazzarol; Samuele Massarut; Jean-Rémi Garbay; Janez Zgajnar; Hanne Galatius; Angelo Recalcati; David Littlejohn; Monika Bamert; Marco Colleoni; Karen N Price; Meredith M Regan; Aron Goldhirsch; Alan S Coates; Richard D Gelber; Umberto Veronesi
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  The risk of axillary relapse after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer is comparable with that of axillary lymph node dissection: a follow-up study of 4008 procedures.

Authors:  Arpana M Naik; Jane Fey; Mary Gemignani; Alexandra Heerdt; Leslie Montgomery; Jeanne Petrek; Elisa Port; Virgilio Sacchini; Lisa Sclafani; Kimberly VanZee; Raquel Wagman; Patrick I Borgen; Hiram S Cody
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Factors predicting additional disease in the axilla in patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jacqueline S Jeruss; Lisa A Newman; Gregory D Ayers; Massimo Cristofanilli; Kristine R Broglio; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Min Yi; Jennifer F Waljee; Merrick I Ross; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Breast Cancer: State of the Art and New Findings.

Authors:  C Melcher; C Scholz; B Jäger; C Hagenbeck; B Rack; W Janni
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.