Literature DB >> 15826688

Differences in the incidence of apoptosis between in vivo and in vitro produced blastocysts of farm animal species: a comparative study.

F J Rubio Pomar1, K J Teerds, A Kidson, B Colenbrander, T Tharasanit, B Aguilar, B A J Roelen.   

Abstract

The occurrence of pregnancies and births after embryo transfer (ET) of in vivo produced embryos is generally more successful compared to that of embryos produced in vitro. This difference in ET success has been observed when embryos of morphological equal (high) quality were used. The incidence of apoptosis has been suggested as an additional criterion to morphological embryo evaluation in order to assess embryo quality and effectively predict embryo viability. In this study, equine, porcine, ovine, caprine and bovine in vivo and in vitro produced morphologically selected high quality (grade-I) blastocysts were compared for the occurrence of apoptosis in blastomeres. The total number of cells per embryo and the number of cells with damaged plasma membranes, fragmented DNA and fragmented nuclei per embryo were assessed in selected blastocysts by combining Ethidium homodimer (EthD-1), terminal dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) and Hoechst 33342 staining. In general, the level of blastomere apoptosis was low. A higher level of apoptosis was observed in in vitro produced equine, porcine and bovine blastocysts compared to their in vivo counterparts. Interestingly, 4 of the initially selected 29 bovine in vitro produced blastocysts exhibited extensive signs of apoptosis affecting the inner cell mass (ICM), which is not compatible with a viable conceptus. Repeated occurrence of this observation may explain the lower ET outcome of in vitro produced bovine embryos compared to in vivo produced embryos. It is concluded that, although in morphologically high quality blastocysts of several farm animal species a significant difference exists in the percentages of apoptotic cells between in vivo and in vitro produced embryos, the incidence of apoptosis at the blastocyst stage is at such a low level that it cannot reflect the substantial differences in embryo viability that have been described between in vivo and in vitro produced blastocysts following ET.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15826688     DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  20 in total

1.  Slow and ultrarapid cryopreservation of biopsied mouse blastocysts and its effect on DNA integrity index.

Authors:  Amr Kader; Tommaso Falcone; Rakesh K Sharma; Devna Mangrola; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Stem Cell-Derived Bioactive Materials Accelerate Development of Porcine In Vitro-Fertilized Embryos.

Authors:  Seung-Eun Lee; Jeremiah Ji-Man Moon; Eun-Young Kim; Se-Pill Park
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.987

3.  Markers of cellular senescence are elevated in murine blastocysts cultured in vitro: molecular consequences of culture in atmospheric oxygen.

Authors:  Alexandra Meuter; Lisa-Marlen Rogmann; Boris J Winterhoff; Tamar Tchkonia; James L Kirkland; Dean E Morbeck
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Cell arrest and cell death in mammalian preimplantation development: lessons from the bovine model.

Authors:  Sandra Leidenfrost; Marc Boelhauve; Myriam Reichenbach; Tuna Güngör; Horst-Dieter Reichenbach; Fred Sinowatz; Eckhard Wolf; Felix A Habermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  In vitro effects of relaxin on gene expression in porcine cumulus-oocyte complexes and developing embryos.

Authors:  Jean M Feugang; Jonathan M Greene; Scott T Willard; Peter L Ryan
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Vitrification of mouse embryos using the thin plastic strip method.

Authors:  Eun Kyung Ryu; Yong Soo Hur; Ji Young Ann; Ja Young Maeng; Miji Park; Jeong Hyun Park; Jung Yoon; San Hyun Yoon; Chang Young Hur; Won Don Lee; Jin Ho Lim
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2012-12-31

7.  Selection of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR in equine in vivo and fresh and frozen-thawed in vitro blastocysts.

Authors:  Katrien Smits; Karen Goossens; Ann Van Soom; Jan Govaere; Maarten Hoogewijs; Emilie Vanhaesebrouck; Cesare Galli; Silvia Colleoni; Jo Vandesompele; Luc Peelman
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-12-11

8.  In vitro culture of feline embryos increases stress-induced heat shock protein 70 and apoptotic related genes.

Authors:  Thanida Sananmuang; Nawapen Phutikanit; Catherine Nguyen; Sukanya Manee-In; Mongkol Techakumphu; Theerawat Tharasanit
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.214

9.  A cathepsin B inhibitor, E-64, improves the preimplantation development of bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos.

Authors:  Sung-Hun Min; Bong-Seok Song; Ji-Yeong Yeon; Jin-Woo Kim; Jung-Ho Bae; Soo-Yong Park; Yong-Hee Lee; Kyu-Tae Chang; Deog-Bon Koo
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 2.214

10.  Melatonin improves the quality of in vitro produced (IVP) bovine embryos: implications for blastocyst development, cryotolerance, and modifications of relevant gene expression.

Authors:  Feng Wang; XiuZhi Tian; YanHua Zhou; DunXian Tan; ShiEn Zhu; YunPing Dai; GuoShi Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.