Literature DB >> 15826611

Appearance questions can be misleading: a discourse-based account of the appearance-reality problem.

Mikkel B Hansen1, Ellen M Markman.   

Abstract

Preschoolers' success on the appearance-reality task is a milestone in theory-of-mind development. On the standard task children see a deceptive object, such as a sponge that looks like a rock, and are asked, "What is this really?" and "What does this look like?" Children below 412 years of age fail saying that the object not only is a sponge but also looks like a sponge. We propose that young children's difficulty stems from ambiguity in the meaning of "looks like." This locution can refer to outward appearance ("Peter looks like Paul") but in fact often refers to likely reality ("That looks like Jim"). We propose that "looks like" is taken to refer to likely reality unless the reality is already part of the common ground of the conversation. Because this joint knowledge is unclear to young children on the appearance-reality task, they mistakenly think the appearance question is about likely reality. Study 1 analyzed everyday conversations from the CHILDES database and documented that 2 and 3-year-olds are familiar with these two different uses of the locution. To disambiguate the meaning of "looks like," Study 2 clarified that reality was shared knowledge as part of the appearance question, e.g., "What does the sponge look like?" Study 3 used a non-linguistic measure to emphasize the shared knowledge of the reality in the appearance question. Study 4 asked children on their own to articulate the contrast between appearance and reality. At 91%, 85%, and 81% correct responses, children were at near ceiling levels in each of our manipulations while they failed the standard versions of the tasks. Moreover, we show how this discourse-based explanation accounts for findings in the literature. Thus children master the appearance-reality distinction by the age of 3 but the standard task masks this understanding because of the discourse structure involved in talking about appearances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15826611     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Culture of science: strange history of the methodological thinking in psychology.

Authors:  Aaro Toomela
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2007-03

2.  Is it or isn't it: listeners make rapid use of prosody to infer speaker meanings.

Authors:  Chigusa Kurumada; Meredith Brown; Sarah Bibyk; Daniel F Pontillo; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-08-14

3.  Children's Evaluative Categories and Inductive Inferences within the Domain of Food.

Authors:  Simone P Nguyen
Journal:  Infant Child Dev       Date:  2008-06-01

4.  Preschoolers can recognize violations of the Gricean maxims.

Authors:  Michelle Eskritt; Juanita Whalen; Kang Lee
Journal:  Br J Dev Psychol       Date:  2008-09-01

5.  Do complement clauses really support false-belief reasoning? A longitudinal study with English-speaking 2- to 3-year-olds.

Authors:  Ditte Boeg Thomsen; Anna Theakston; Birsu Kandemirci; Silke Brandt
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2021-08

6.  Smoke and mirrors: Testing the scope of chimpanzees' appearance-reality understanding.

Authors:  Carla Krachun; Robert Lurz; Jamie L Russell; William D Hopkins
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-02-02

7.  If You Know Something, Say Something: Young Children's Problem with False Beliefs.

Authors:  Mikkel B Hansen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-07-05

8.  More than meets the eye: young children's trust in claims that defy their perceptions.

Authors:  Jonathan D Lane; Paul L Harris; Susan A Gelman; Henry M Wellman
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2013-09-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.