Literature DB >> 15825118

Consequences of testing for celiac disease.

Ann Cranney1, Alaa Rostom, Richmond Sy, Catherine Dubé, Navaz Saloogee, Chantal Garritty, David Moher, Margaret Sampson, Li Zhang, Fatemeh Yazdi, Vasil Mamaladze, Irene Pan, Joanne MacNeil.   

Abstract

Population screening studies have identified that up to two thirds of celiac disease (CD) cases are asymptomatic. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the expected consequences of testing for CD in the following populations: (1) patients with symptoms suggestive of CD, (2) asymptomatic at-risk populations, and (3) general population. Standard systematic review methodology was used. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE (1996-2003), EMBASE (1974-2003), CAB (1972 forward), PsychINFO (1840-2003), AGRICOLA (1970-2003), and Sociological Abstracts (1963 forward); searches were conducted in December 2003. Pooled summary estimates were not calculated. The majority of the included studies were before-after studies, case control, or retrospective cohorts. The quality of evidence for the before-after studies is weaker. The overall strength of the evidence for this issue was fair to good. This area of research is relatively new, and further high-quality studies are required. The consequences of testing for celiac disease in symptomatic individuals appears to have a positive impact on patient-relevant outcomes. The data are less clear for those with silent CD or those with lower grade histologic lesions in small bowel biopsy. The literature suggests that compliance is less than ideal in these individuals, especially if diagnosed when adults. Long-term outcomes have not been extensively studied in those with silent CD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15825118     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  5 in total

1.  The Canadian Celiac Health Survey.

Authors:  Ann Cranney; Marion Zarkadas; Ian D Graham; J Decker Butzner; Mohsin Rashid; Ralph Warren; Mavis Molloy; Shelley Case; Vernon Burrows; Connie Switzer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Impact of mass screening for gluten-sensitive enteropathy in working population.

Authors:  Meritxell Mariné; Fernando Fernández-Bañares; Montserrat Alsina; Carme Farré; Montserrat Cortijo; Rebeca Santaolalla; Antonio Salas; Margarita Tomàs; Elias Abugattas; Carme Loras; Ingrid Ordás; Josep-M Viver; Maria Esteve
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Celiac disease: an underappreciated issue in women’s health.

Authors:  Sveta Shah; Daniel Leffler
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2010-09

4.  ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease.

Authors:  Alberto Rubio-Tapia; Ivor D Hill; Ciarán P Kelly; Audrey H Calderwood; Joseph A Murray
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Update on celiac disease - etiology, differential diagnosis, drug targets, and management advances.

Authors:  Samantha A Scanlon; Joseph A Murray
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.