Literature DB >> 15821188

Como international conference position statement: lung cancer screening for early diagnosis 5 years after the 1998 Varese conference.

Gary M Strauss1, Lorenzo Dominioni, James R Jett, Matthew Freedman, Frederic W Grannis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in the world. Nonetheless, public policy organizations have consistently recommended against screening for lung cancer, with the result that screening is not widely practiced. The Como Conference was undertaken to consider the need for a change in the existing recommendations against screening. PURPOSES: The primary objective of the Como Conference was to consider whether there is sufficient scientific evidence to advise screening for lung cancer among asymptomatic individuals outside the context of a clinical trial. Methodological issues that are relevant to the proper interpretation of early detection trials were carefully considered. Advantages and problems associated with technological advances in CT scans and digital chest radiographs (CXRs) were fully explored. Economic issues relevant to screening were also considered. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that physicians assume responsibility for informing high-risk individuals regarding options for screening for lung cancer. Targeted high-risk individuals include middle-aged or elderly men and women who are current or former cigarette smokers of > 20 to 30 pack-years without serious medical comorbidities. It is recommended that such persons be informed that symptomatic lung cancer is usually advanced and incurable, while surgery for early lung cancer offers a far better chance of cure. They should also be informed about advances in imaging technology, as they relate to CT scans and CXRs.
CONCLUSIONS: Whenever possible, high-risk individuals should be encouraged to enroll in ongoing trials. For subjects who, though eligible, do not have access to such trials, a process of shared decision-making between physicians and at-risk individuals is strongly recommended. After discussion of the existing state of knowledge, high-risk individuals should be made aware that it is reasonable for them to choose to undergo testing for lung cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15821188     DOI: 10.1378/chest.127.4.1146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  6 in total

Review 1.  Lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Tarek Mekhail
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Lung cancer in Teesside (UK) and Varese (Italy): a comparison of management and survival.

Authors:  A Imperatori; R N Harrison; D N Leitch; F Rovera; G Lepore; G Dionigi; P Sutton; L Dominioni
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  The use of CT for screening: a national survey of radiologists' activities and attitudes.

Authors:  Ingrid M Burger; Nancy E Kass; Jonathan H Sunshine; Stanley S Siegelman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Screening in the dark: ethical considerations of providing screening tests to individuals when evidence is insufficient to support screening populations.

Authors:  Ingrid M Burger; Nancy E Kass
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  [Computed tomography screening for lung cancer].

Authors:  N Becker
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  The assessment of the role of baseline low-dose CT scan in patients at high risk of lung cancer.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kołaczyk; Anna Walecka; Tomasz Grodzki; Jacek Alchimowicz; Andrzej Smereczyński; Radosław Kiedrowicz
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.