Literature DB >> 15820516

Integrating visual cues for motor control: a matter of time.

Hal S Greenwald1, David C Knill, Jeffrey A Saunders.   

Abstract

The visual system continuously integrates multiple sensory cues to help plan and control everyday motor tasks. We quantified how subjects integrated monocular cues (contour and texture) and binocular cues (disparity and vergence) about 3D surface orientation throughout an object placement task and found that binocular cues contributed more to online control than planning. A temporal analysis of corrective responses to stimulus perturbations revealed that the visuomotor system processes binocular cues faster than monocular cues. This suggests that binocular cues dominated online control because they were available sooner, thus affecting a larger proportion of the movement. This was consistent with our finding that the relative influence of binocular information was higher for short-duration movements than long-duration movements. A motor control model that optimally integrates cues with different delays accounts for our findings and shows that cue integration for motor control depends in part on the time course of cue processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15820516     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  19 in total

1.  How to use individual differences to isolate functional organization, biology, and utility of visual functions; with illustrative proposals for stereopsis.

Authors:  Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2008

2.  Online processing of shape information for control of grasping.

Authors:  Zhongting Chen; Jeffrey A Saunders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Binocular and monocular depth cues in online feedback control of 3D pointing movement.

Authors:  Bo Hu; David C Knill
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Motor learning reveals the existence of multiple codes for movement planning.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.

Authors:  Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Modulation of isochronous movements in a flexible environment: links between motion and auditory experience.

Authors:  Riccardo Bravi; Claudia Del Tongo; Erez James Cohen; Gabriele Dalle Mura; Alessandro Tognetti; Diego Minciacchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Angular declination and the dynamic perception of egocentric distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; John W Philbeck; Philip W Wirtz; David Chichka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Age- and stereovision-dependent eye-hand coordination deficits in children with amblyopia and abnormal binocularity.

Authors:  Simon Grant; Catherine Suttle; Dean R Melmoth; Miriam L Conway; John J Sloper
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Static and dynamic visual cues in feed-forward postural control.

Authors:  Sambit Mohapatra; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Cue integration outside central fixation: a study of grasping in depth.

Authors:  Hal S Greenwald; David C Knill
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.