Literature DB >> 15817187

Familiarity increases consistency in animal tests.

Katja S van Driel1, Janet C Talling.   

Abstract

This experiment investigated the effect of identity of the experimenter and familiarity to their test animals on results obtained from a standard test of anxiety. We found that having different experimenters perform the same test (i.e. elevated plus maze) using the same equipment and rats from the same breeding colony within the same room of the same laboratory significantly affects the results if the experimenters are unfamiliar to the animals, but not if they are familiar to them. Familiarity of the test animals with their experimenters should therefore increase consistency in results from animal tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15817187     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  17 in total

1.  Of mice and zebrafish: the impact of the experimenter identity on animal behavior.

Authors:  Murilo S de Abreu; Allan V Kalueff
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 12.625

2.  Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation.

Authors:  Bernhard Voelkl; Naomi S Altman; Anders Forsman; Wolfgang Forstmeier; Jessica Gurevitch; Ivana Jaric; Natasha A Karp; Martien J Kas; Holger Schielzeth; Tom Van de Casteele; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Olfactory exposure to males, including men, causes stress and related analgesia in rodents.

Authors:  Robert E Sorge; Loren J Martin; Kelsey A Isbester; Susana G Sotocinal; Sarah Rosen; Alexander H Tuttle; Jeffrey S Wieskopf; Erinn L Acland; Anastassia Dokova; Basil Kadoura; Philip Leger; Josiane C S Mapplebeck; Martina McPhail; Ada Delaney; Gustaf Wigerblad; Alan P Schumann; Tammie Quinn; Johannes Frasnelli; Camilla I Svensson; Wendy F Sternberg; Jeffrey S Mogil
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Experimenter effects on behavioral test scores of eight inbred mouse strains under the influence of ethanol.

Authors:  Martin Bohlen; Erika R Hayes; Benjamin Bohlen; Jeremy D Bailoo; John C Crabbe; Douglas Wahlsten
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The fully automated bat (FAB) flight room: A human-free environment for studying navigation in flying bats and its initial application to the retrosplenial cortex.

Authors:  Daria Genzel; Michael M Yartsev
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  PhenoWorld: a new paradigm to screen rodent behavior.

Authors:  M Castelhano-Carlos; P S Costa; H Russig; N Sousa
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 7.  Sleep deprivation and stress: a reciprocal relationship.

Authors:  Mathieu Nollet; William Wisden; Nicholas P Franks
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Exhaustive Multi-Parametric Assessment of the Behavioral Array of Daily Activities of Mice Using Cluster and Factor Analysis.

Authors:  Kenzo Yamamoto; Katsiaryna V Gris; Jesús E Sotelo Fonseca; Marjan Gharagozloo; Shaimaa Mahmoud; Camille Simard; Daphné Houle-Martel; Theodore Cloutier; Pavel Gris; Denis Gris
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Temporal dissociation of phencyclidine: Induced locomotor and social alterations in rats using an automated homecage monitoring system - implications for the 3Rs and preclinical drug discovery.

Authors:  Emma J Mitchell; Ros R Brett; J Douglas Armstrong; Rowland R Sillito; Judith A Pratt
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 4.153

Review 10.  Structured evaluation of rodent behavioral tests used in drug discovery research.

Authors:  Anders Hånell; Niklas Marklund
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.