Literature DB >> 1581594

Comparison of clinical and real-life judgments of loudness discomfort.

P R Filion1, R H Margolis.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the loudness discomfort level (LDL) and real-life impressions of loudness discomfort. LDLs were measured with an established procedure for a variety of stimuli including FM tones, speech noise, and stimuli recorded from two real-life environments, in two groups of subjects. Sound pressure level distributions were measured in each of two environments at the time of subject recruitment, and LDLs were subsequently measured. LDLs were then compared to the sound pressure levels measured in each environment, and to the impressions of loudness discomfort which subjects reported through the use of a questionnaire. Results indicated large discrepancies between LDLs and judgments of loudness discomfort in real-life environments. The LDL does not appear to be an accurate predictor of subjects' impression of loudness discomfort and may not be appropriate for setting the SSPL of hearing aids.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1581594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  4 in total

Review 1.  Considerations in the Development of a Sound Tolerance Interview and Questionnaire Instrument.

Authors:  LaGuinn P Sherlock; Craig Formby
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

Review 2.  Clinical and investigational tools for monitoring noise-induced hyperacusis.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  Elevated Acoustic Startle Responses in Humans: Relationship to Reduced Loudness Discomfort Level, but not Self-Report of Hyperacusis.

Authors:  Inge M Knudson; Jennifer R Melcher
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-01

4.  Sensitivity to sounds in sport-related concussed athletes: a new clinical presentation of hyperacusis.

Authors:  Hussein Assi; R Davis Moore; Dave Ellemberg; Sylvie Hébert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.