Literature DB >> 15815930

[Pain assessment in invasive diagnostic procedures. Comparison of an eleven-point numerical rating scale and a six-point verbal rating scale for pain measurement in bone marrow puncture].

M Weber1, J Schüz, J Kuball, H Gamm, J Jage.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Pain measurement during diagnostic procedures is an accepted prerequisite for appropriate therapy. In this study, the agreement between rankings of pain intensity on a numerical and a verbal rating scale was analyzed.
METHODS: Patients attending a haematological outpatient clinic who underwent bone marrow puncture were requested to assess pain intensity perceived during the procedure on a elen-point numerical and a six-point verbal rating scale.
RESULTS: Analysis of patients' pain ratings in 263 bone marrow punctures showed a very good correlation between numerical and verbal rating scale (Spearman correlation coefficient 0,86). By means of a transfer instruction categories of the verbal rating scale were assigned to figures of the numerical rating scale (0 - no pain, 1 or 2 - mild p., 3, 4 or 5 moderate p., 6 or 7 severe p., 8, 9 or 10 - very severe and worst possible pain). The resulting transfer table showed a good agreement with a weighted kappa of 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.66-0.79).
CONCLUSION: Both scales can be employed efficiently for pain assessment during diagnostic procedures. Verbal categories can be assigned to numerical values and vice versa numerical values to verbal categories. However, in view of the inter-individual variations it appears appropriate to re-assure pain perception with each patient in order to avoid over- or undertreatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15815930     DOI: 10.1007/s00482-005-0393-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  28 in total

1.  A descriptive study of the use of visual analogue scales and verbal rating scales for the assessment of postoperative pain in orthopedic patients.

Authors:  M Briggs; J S Closs
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Pain relief into practice: rhetoric without reform.

Authors:  K M Foley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Pain measurement tools and methods in clinical research in palliative care: recommendations of an Expert Working Group of the European Association of Palliative Care.

Authors:  Augusto Caraceni; Nathan Cherny; Robin Fainsinger; Stein Kaasa; Philippe Poulain; Lukas Radbruch; Franco De Conno
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Paul Karoly; Sanford Braver
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Temporal presentation of chronic cancer pain: transitory pains on admission to a multidisciplinary pain clinic.

Authors:  F Petzke; L Radbruch; D Zech; G Loick; S Grond
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Patients' memories of painful medical treatments: real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures.

Authors:  Donald A Redelmeier; Daniel Kahneman
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases.

Authors:  R L Daut; C S Cleeland; R C Flanery
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer.

Authors:  C S Cleeland; R Gonin; A K Hatfield; J H Edmonson; R H Blum; J A Stewart; K J Pandya
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-03-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Regular use of a verbal pain scale improves the understanding of oncology inpatient pain intensity.

Authors:  E Au; C L Loprinzi; M Dhodapkar; T Nelson; P Novotny; J Hammack; J O'Fallon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  A visual analogue thermometer for measuring pain intensity.

Authors:  M Choinière; R Amsel
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.612

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Comparative Study of the Effect of Sutureless Versus Multiple Sutures Technique on Complications following Third Molar Surgery in Nepalese Subpopulation.

Authors:  Arun Kr Mahat; Ram Yadav; Anjani Kr Yadav; Pradeep Acharya; Ashok Dongol; Alok Sagtani; Mehul R Jaisani
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-02-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.