Literature DB >> 10641470

A descriptive study of the use of visual analogue scales and verbal rating scales for the assessment of postoperative pain in orthopedic patients.

M Briggs1, J S Closs.   

Abstract

Visual analogue scales (VAS) and verbal rating scales (VRS) are widely used to assess pain. This paper presents a secondary analysis of a subsection of data collected as part of an evaluation of an intervention to improve nighttime pain. The aims were to describe the relationship between the VAS and VRS; to compare characteristics of the noncompliant groups in terms of age, gender, type of surgery, and analgesics; to explore the reasons for noncompletion of the VAS or VRS; and to determine the noncompliance rates with each assessment scale. Worst and average pain scores were obtained for the second postoperative night for 417 patients. Fifty-nine patients (14.2%) did not complete the VAS. In contrast, two patients did not complete the VRS (0.5%). The scores generated from the VAS and VRS correlated well, although the range of VAS scores corresponding to each VRS category was wide. We conclude that the VRS was more suitable for use in this clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10641470     DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(99)00092-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  49 in total

1.  [Perioperative pain therapy in orthopedics].

Authors:  T Fikentscher; J Grifka; A Benditz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Interdisciplinary position paper "Perioperative pain management"].

Authors:  R Likar; W Jaksch; T Aigmüller; M Brunner; T Cohnert; J Dieber; W Eisner; S Geyrhofer; G Grögl; F Herbst; R Hetterle; F Javorsky; H G Kress; O Kwasny; S Madersbacher; H Mächler; R Mittermair; J Osterbrink; B Stöckl; M Sulzbacher; B Taxer; B Todoroff; A Tuchmann; A Wicker; A Sandner-Kiesling
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  [Pain assessment in invasive diagnostic procedures. Comparison of an eleven-point numerical rating scale and a six-point verbal rating scale for pain measurement in bone marrow puncture].

Authors:  M Weber; J Schüz; J Kuball; H Gamm; J Jage
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  Value of fentanyl in flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  Sanjoy Basu; Badri Krishnamurthy; Tim H Walsh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Anterior versus posterior approach in surgical treatment of tuberculous spondylodiscitis of thoracic and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Khaled Hassan; Essam Elmorshidy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  [Acute pain therapy in orthopedics/trauma surgery].

Authors:  S Rehart; M Henniger; M Arndt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Lateral Anal Sphincterotomy for Chronic Anal Fissures- A Comparison of Outcomes and Complications under Local Anaesthesia Versus Spinal Anaesthesia.

Authors:  Ravikumar Manoharan; Tarun Jacob; Santosh Benjamin; Sumonth Kirishnan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-01-01

8.  Cost-effective laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair: the Portsmouth technique.

Authors:  S Basu; S Chandran; S S Somers; S K C Toh
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-11-05       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Evaluation of Lower-Dose Spiral Head CT for Detection of Intracranial Findings Causing Neurologic Deficits.

Authors:  J G Fletcher; D R DeLone; A L Kotsenas; N G Campeau; V T Lehman; L Yu; S Leng; D R Holmes; P K Edwards; M P Johnson; G J Michalak; R E Carter; C H McCollough
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Comparison of numerical and verbal rating scales to measure pain exacerbations in patients with chronic cancer pain.

Authors:  Cinzia Brunelli; Ernesto Zecca; Cinzia Martini; Tiziana Campa; Elena Fagnoni; Michela Bagnasco; Luigi Lanata; Augusto Caraceni
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.