Literature DB >> 15815086

Prediction of density and mechanical properties of human trabecular bone in vitro by using ultrasound transmission and backscattering measurements at 0.2-6.7 MHz frequency range.

Mikko A Hakulinen1, Judd S Day, Juha Töyräs, Matti Timonen, Heikki Kröger, Harrie Weinans, Ilkka Kiviranta, Jukka S Jurvelin.   

Abstract

The ultrasound (US) backscattering method has been introduced as an alternative for the through-transmission measurement of sound attenuation and speed in diagnosis of osteoporosis. Both attenuation and backscattering depend strongly on the US frequency. In this study, 20 human trabecular bone samples were measured in transmission and pulse-echo geometry in vitro. The aim of the study was to find the most sensitive frequency range for the quantitative ultrasound (QUS) analyses. Normalized broadband US attenuation (nBUA), speed of sound (SOS), broadband US backscatter (BUB) and integrated reflection coefficient (IRC) were determined for each sample. The samples were spatially scanned with five pairs of US transducers covering a frequency range of 0.2-6.7 MHz. Furthermore, mechanical properties and density of the same samples were determined. At all frequencies, SOS, BUB and IRC showed statistically significant linear correlations with the mechanical properties or density of human trabecular bone (0.51 < r < 0.82, 0.54 < r < 0.81 and 0.70 < r < 0.85, respectively). In contrast to SOS, IRC and BUB, nBUA showed statistically significant correlations with mechanical parameters or density at the centre frequency of 1 MHz only. Our results suggest that frequencies up to 5 MHz can be useful in QUS analyses for the prediction of bone mechanical properties and density. Since the use of higher frequencies provides better axial and spatial resolution, improved structural analyses may be possible. While extensive attenuation of high frequencies in trabecular bone limits the clinically feasible frequency range, selection of optimal frequency range for in vivo QUS application should be carefully considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15815086     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/8/001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  22 in total

1.  Relationships of quantitative ultrasound parameters with cancellous bone microstructure in human calcaneus in vitro.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Srinidhi Nagaraja; Maureen L Dreher; Sheng L Gibson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The dependence of time-domain speed-of-sound measurements on center frequency, bandwidth, and transit-time marker in human calcaneus in vitro.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effect of phase cancellation on estimates of broadband ultrasound attenuation and backscatter coefficient in human calcaneus in vitro.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  The effect of phase cancellation on estimates of calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation in vivo.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Mechanisms for attenuation in cancellous-bone-mimicking phantoms.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 6.  Ultrasonic scattering from cancellous bone: a review.

Authors:  K A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  A-Mode ultrasound guidance for pedicle screw advancement in ovine vertebral bodies.

Authors:  David T Raphael; Jin Ho Chang; Yao Ping Zhang; David Kudija; Thomas C Chen; K Kirk Shung
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Ultrasonic backscatter difference measurements of cancellous bone from the human femur: Relation to bone mineral density and microstructure.

Authors:  Brent K Hoffmeister; Ann M Viano; Jinsong Huang; Luke C Fairbanks; Sheldon C Ebron; Joshua T Moore; Jordan P Ankersen; Matthew T Huber; Abel A Diaz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yihan Li; Hongbo Zhao; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  A backscatter difference technique for ultrasonic bone assessment.

Authors:  Brent K Hoffmeister; Anne R Wilson; Matthew J Gilbert; Mark E Sellers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.