Literature DB >> 15814456

mRNA decay in prokaryotes and eukaryotes: different approaches to a similar problem.

Sidney R Kushner1.   

Abstract

Over the past 15 years considerable progress has been made in understanding the molecular mechanisms of mRNA decay in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Interestingly, unlike other important biological reactions such as DNA replication and repair, many features of mRNA decay differ between prokaryotes or eukaryotes. Even when a particular enzyme like poly(A) polymerase has been conserved, polyadenylation of mRNAs in prokaryotes appears to serve a very different function than it does in eukaryotes. Furthermore, while mRNA degrading multiprotein complexes have been identified in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, their composition and biochemical mechanisms are significantly different. Accordingly, this review seeks to provide a concise comparison of our current knowledge regarding the pathways of mRNA decay in two model organisms, the prokaryote Escherichia coli and the eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15814456     DOI: 10.1080/15216540400022441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IUBMB Life        ISSN: 1521-6543            Impact factor:   3.885


  43 in total

Review 1.  Novel endoribonucleases as central players in various pathways of eukaryotic RNA metabolism.

Authors:  Rafal Tomecki; Andrzej Dziembowski
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 4.942

2.  Addition of poly(A) and poly(A)-rich tails during RNA degradation in the cytoplasm of human cells.

Authors:  Shimyn Slomovic; Ella Fremder; Raymond H G Staals; Ger J M Pruijn; Gadi Schuster
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Translation initiation: variations in the mechanism can be anticipated.

Authors:  Naglis Malys; John E G McCarthy
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Small RNA-induced mRNA degradation achieved through both translation block and activated cleavage.

Authors:  Karine Prévost; Guillaume Desnoyers; Jean-François Jacques; François Lavoie; Eric Massé
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Quality control of bacterial mRNA decoding and decay.

Authors:  Jamie Richards; Thomas Sundermeier; Anton Svetlanov; A Wali Karzai
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2008-03-04

6.  Assessment of anaerobic toluene biodegradation activity by bssA transcript/gene ratios.

Authors:  Christina N Brow; Reid O'Brien Johnson; Richard L Johnson; Holly M Simon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Determining degradation intermediates and the pathway of 3' to 5' degradation of histone mRNA using high-throughput sequencing.

Authors:  Christopher E Holmquist; William F Marzluff
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.608

8.  Coding sequence targeting by MicC RNA reveals bacterial mRNA silencing downstream of translational initiation.

Authors:  Verena Pfeiffer; Kai Papenfort; Sacha Lucchini; Jay C D Hinton; Jörg Vogel
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 15.369

9.  3' adenylation determines mRNA abundance and monitors completion of RNA editing in T. brucei mitochondria.

Authors:  Ronald D Etheridge; Inna Aphasizheva; Paul D Gershon; Ruslan Aphasizhev
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Exoribonuclease R in Mycoplasma genitalium can carry out both RNA processing and degradative functions and is sensitive to RNA ribose methylation.

Authors:  Maureen S Lalonde; Yuhong Zuo; Jianwei Zhang; Xin Gong; Shaohui Wu; Arun Malhotra; Zhongwei Li
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 4.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.