Literature DB >> 15813501

Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: an empirical validation.

Andreas Voss1, Klaus Rothermund, Jochen Voss.   

Abstract

The diffusion model (Ratcliff, 1978) allows for the statistical separation of different components of a speeded binary decision process (decision threshold, bias, information uptake, and motor response). These components are represented by different parameters of the model. Two experiments were conducted to test the interpretational validity of the parameters. Using a color discrimination task, we investigated whether experimental manipulations of specific aspects of the decision process had specific effects on the corresponding parameters in a diffusion model data analysis (see Ratcliff, 2002; Ratcliff & Rouder, 1998; Ratcliff, Thapar, & McKoon, 2001, 2003). In support of the model, we found that (1) decision thresholds were higher when we induced accuracy motivation, (2) drift rates (i.e., information uptake) were lower when stimuli were harder to discriminate, (3) the motor components were increased when a more difficult form of response was required, and (4) the process was biased toward rewarded responses.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15813501     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  11 in total

Review 1.  Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting.

Authors:  J D Schall
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; T Van Zandt; G McKoon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Dissociative affective and associative priming effects in the lexical decision task: yes versus no responses to word targets reveal evaluative judgment tendencies.

Authors:  D Wentura
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Explicitly modeling the effects of aging on response time.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; D Spieler; G McKoon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

5.  Figure-ground asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test (IAT).

Authors:  K Rothermund; D Wentura
Journal:  Z Exp Psychol       Date:  2001

6.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Francis Tuerlinckx
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

7.  A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on brightness discrimination.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Anjali Thapar; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-05

8.  A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

9.  Continuous versus discrete information processing modeling accumulation of partial information.

Authors:  R Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test.

Authors:  C M Brendl; A B Markman; C Messner
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-11
View more
  133 in total

1.  Children are not like older adults: a diffusion model analysis of developmental changes in speeded responses.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Jessica Love; Clarissa A Thompson; John E Opfer
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2011-12-21

2.  Comparing perceptual and preferential decision making.

Authors:  Gilles Dutilh; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

Review 3.  Serial vs. parallel models of attention in visual search: accounting for benchmark RT-distributions.

Authors:  Rani Moran; Michael Zehetleitner; Heinrich René Liesefeld; Hermann J Müller; Marius Usher
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

4.  Effects of aging in a task-switch paradigm with the diffusion decision model.

Authors:  Nadja R Ging-Jehli; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2020-07-27

Review 5.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Han L J van der Maas; Raoul P P P Grasman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

7.  How attention influences perceptual decision making: Single-trial EEG correlates of drift-diffusion model parameters.

Authors:  Michael D Nunez; Joachim Vandekerckhove; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.223

8.  Modeling aging effects on two-choice tasks: response signal and response time data.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-12

9.  Individual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Anjali Thapar; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Reward rate optimization in two-alternative decision making: empirical tests of theoretical predictions.

Authors:  Patrick Simen; David Contreras; Cara Buck; Peter Hu; Philip Holmes; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.