Literature DB >> 15813201

Some characteristics of auditory spatial attention revealed using rhythmic masking release.

Andrew J Sach1, Peter J Bailey.   

Abstract

The tuning of auditory spatial attention with respect to interaural level and time difference cues (ILDs and ITDs) was explored using a rhythmic masking release (RMR) procedure. Listeners heard tone sequences defining one of two simple target rhythms, interleaved with arhythmic masking tones, presented over headphones. There were two conditions, which differed only in the ILD of the tones defining the target rhythm: For one condition, ILD was 0 dB and the perceived lateral position was central, and for the other, ILD was 4 dB and the perceived lateral position was to the right; target tone ITD was always zero. For the masking tones, ILD was fixed at 0 dB and ITDs were varied, giving rise to a range of lateral positions determined by ITD. The listeners' task was to attend to and identify the target rhythm. The data showed that target rhythm identification accuracy was low, indicating that maskers were effective, when target and masker shared spatial position, but not when they shared only ITD. A clear implication is that at least within the constraints of the RMR paradigm, overall spatial position, and not ITD, is the substrate for auditory spatial attention.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15813201     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  8 in total

1.  Listening to speech in the presence of other sounds.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Object-based auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Stream segregation with high spatial acuity.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks; Zekiye A Onsan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Discrimination and streaming of speech sounds based on differences in interaural and spectral cues.

Authors:  Marion David; Mathieu Lavandier; Nicolas Grimault; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Properties of auditory stream formation.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Hedwig E Gockel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  A Collection of Pseudo-Words to Study Multi-Talker Speech Intelligibility without Shifts of Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Kachina Allen; David Alais; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-15

7.  Weighting of spatial and spectro-temporal cues for auditory scene analysis by human listeners.

Authors:  Peter Bremen; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Role of Temporal Cues in Voluntary Stream Segregation for Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Andreu Paredes-Gallardo; Sara M K Madsen; Torsten Dau; Jeremy Marozeau
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.