Literature DB >> 15813196

Task- and location-switching effects on visual attention.

James F Juola1, Juan Botella, Antonio Palacios.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we examined the effects of task and location switching on the accuracy of reporting target characters in an attentional blink (AB) paradigm. Single-character streams were presented at a rate of 100 msec per character in Experiment 1, and successive pairs of characters on either side of fixation were presented in Experiment 2. On each trial, two targets appeared that were either white letters or black digits embedded in a stream of black letter distractors, and they were separated by between zero and five items in the stream (lags 1-6). Experiment 1 showed that report of the first target was least accurate if it immediately preceded the second target and if the two targets were either both letters or both digits (task repetition cost). Report of the second target was least accurate if one or two distractors intervened between the two targets (the U-shaped AB lag effect) and if one target was a letter and the other a digit (task switch cost). Experiment 2 added location uncertainty as a factor and showed similar effects as Experiment 1, with one exception. Lag 1 sparing (the preserved accuracy in reporting the second of two targets if the second immediately follows the first) was completely eliminated when the task required attention switching across locations. Two-way additive effects were found between task switching and location switching in the AB paradigm. These results suggests separate loci for their attentional effects. It is likely that the AB deficit is due mainly to central memory limitations, whereas location-switching costs occur at early visual levels. Task-switching costs occur at an intermediate visual level, since the present task switch involved encoding differences without changes in stimulus-response mapping rules (i.e., the task was character identification for both letters and digits).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15813196     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  7 in total

1.  Direction of association between targets in a RSVP task influences priming at very short but not long SOAs.

Authors:  Milton T Nyawata; Karen Murphy
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-10-04

2.  Attentional control and competition between episodic representations.

Authors:  Elkan G Akyürek; Anna Schubö; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-08-02

3.  Set-specific capture can be reduced by preemptively occupying a limited-capacity focus of attention.

Authors:  Katherine Sledge Moore; Daniel H Weissman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011-01-01

4.  Hold it! Memory affects attentional dwell time.

Authors:  Emily L Parks; Joseph B Hopfinger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-12

5.  Erroneous selection of a non-target item improves subsequent target identification in rapid serial visual presentations.

Authors:  Yuki Yamada; Atsunori Ariga; Kayo Miura; Takahiro Kawabe
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-02-28

6.  Spatial distribution of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Feng Du; Richard A Abrams; Kan Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-12-07

7.  A bottleneck model of set-specific capture.

Authors:  Katherine Sledge Moore; Daniel H Weissman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.