Literature DB >> 15812191

Porcine endogenous retroviruses PERV-A and PERV-B infect neither mouse cells in vitro nor SCID mice in vivo.

Markus Irgang1, Alexander Karlas, Christine Laue, Volker Specke, Stefan J Tacke, Reinhard Kurth, Jurgen Schrezenmeir, Joachim Denner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) pose a risk for xenotransplantations using pig materials as they are present in the genome of all pigs and are able to infect human cells in vitro. Until recently, transmission of PERVs in vivo was only described in severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) and nude mice inoculated with PERV-producing cells. However, in this series of experiments microchimerism could not be excluded. To overcome this problem, the risk of PERV infection was addressed in a similar way but using cell-free inoculation of mouse cells in vitro and SCID mice in vivo.
METHODS: Mouse cell lines and primary cells were incubated in vitro with PERV-A, with a recombinant PERV-A/C and with PERV-B. Provirus integration was assessed by PCR. Reverse transcriptase activity was measured in the cell supernatants. SCID mice were inoculated in vivo with cell-free virus at high titers.
RESULTS: None of the mouse cell lines and primary cells could be infected by PERV and no provirus integration was observed in different organs of the inoculated SCID mice.
CONCLUSION: The data indicate that PERV-A, PERV-A/C and PERV-B could not infect different mouse cells. These data correlate with the recent finding that mouse cells lack a functional receptor for PERV-A. Although the receptor for PERV-B is still unknown, these data suggest that previously reported PERV transmissions to SCID and nude mice in vivo might be due to microchimerism or pseudotyping with murine viruses and indicate that normal mice are an inappropriate model for the study of PERV infection and pathogenesis. Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15812191     DOI: 10.1159/000081745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intervirology        ISSN: 0300-5526            Impact factor:   1.763


  8 in total

1.  Transspecies transmission of the endogenous koala retrovirus.

Authors:  Uwe Fiebig; Manuel Garcia Hartmann; Norbert Bannert; Reinhard Kurth; Joachim Denner
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 2.  Infection barriers to successful xenotransplantation focusing on porcine endogenous retroviruses.

Authors:  Joachim Denner; Ralf R Tönjes
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Review on porcine endogenous retrovirus detection assays--impact on quality and safety of xenotransplants.

Authors:  Antonia W Godehardt; Michael Rodrigues Costa; Ralf R Tönjes
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 4.  Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses and Xenotransplantation, 2021.

Authors:  Joachim Denner
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 5.  Mouse models with human immunity and their application in biomedical research.

Authors:  Baojun Zhang; Ziyuan Duan; Yong Zhao
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 6.  Porcine endogenous retroviruses in xenotransplantation--molecular aspects.

Authors:  Magdalena C Kimsa; Barbara Strzalka-Mrozik; Malgorzata W Kimsa; Joanna Gola; Peter Nicholson; Krzysztof Lopata; Urszula Mazurek
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 5.048

7.  Erratum to: Islet Xeno/transplantation and the risk of contagion: local responses from Canada and Australia to an emerging global technoscience.

Authors:  Myra Cheng
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2016

Review 8.  Why was PERV not transmitted during preclinical and clinical xenotransplantation trials and after inoculation of animals?

Authors:  Joachim Denner
Journal:  Retrovirology       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.602

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.