Literature DB >> 15811983

Evaluating iatrogenic risk of youth suicide screening programs: a randomized controlled trial.

Madelyn S Gould1, Frank A Marrocco, Marjorie Kleinman, John Graham Thomas, Katherine Mostkoff, Jean Cote, Mark Davies.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Universal screening for mental health problems and suicide risk is at the forefront of the national agenda for youth suicide prevention, yet no study has directly addressed the potential harm of suicide screening.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether asking about suicidal ideation or behavior during a screening program creates distress or increases suicidal ideation among high school students generally or among high-risk students reporting depressive symptoms, substance use problems, or suicide attempts. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized controlled study conducted within the context of a 2-day screening strategy. Participants were 2342 students in 6 high schools in New York State in 2002-2004. Classes were randomized to an experimental group (n = 1172), which received the first survey with suicide questions, or to a control group (n = 1170), which did not receive suicide questions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Distress measured at the end of the first survey and at the beginning of the second survey 2 days after the first measured on the Profile of Mood States adolescent version (POMS-A) instrument. Suicidal ideation assessed in the second survey.
RESULTS: Experimental and control groups did not differ on distress levels immediately after the first survey (mean [SD] POMS-A score, 5.5 [9.7] in the experimental group and 5.1 [10.0] in the control group; P = .66) or 2 days later (mean [SD] POMS-A score, 4.3 [9.0] in the experimental group and 3.9 [9.4] in the control group; P = .41), nor did rates of depressive feelings differ (13.3% and 11.0%, respectively; P = .19). Students exposed to suicide questions were no more likely to report suicidal ideation after the survey than unexposed students (4.7% and 3.9%, respectively; P = .49). High-risk students (defined as those with depression symptoms, substance use problems, or any previous suicide attempt) in the experimental group were neither more suicidal nor distressed than high-risk youth in the control group; on the contrary, depressed students and previous suicide attempters in the experimental group appeared less distressed (P = .01) and suicidal (P = .02), respectively, than high-risk control students.
CONCLUSIONS: No evidence of iatrogenic effects of suicide screening emerged. Screening in high schools is a safe component of youth suicide prevention efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15811983     DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.13.1635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  112 in total

1.  An outcome evaluation of the Sources of Strength suicide prevention program delivered by adolescent peer leaders in high schools.

Authors:  Peter A Wyman; C Hendricks Brown; Mark LoMurray; Karen Schmeelk-Cone; Mariya Petrova; Qin Yu; Erin Walsh; Xin Tu; Wei Wang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Examining How Context Changes Intervention Impact: The Use of Effect Sizes in Multilevel Mixture Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  C Hendricks Brown; Wei Wang; Irwin Sandler
Journal:  Child Dev Perspect       Date:  2008-11-28

3.  Evidence-Based Suicide Prevention Screening in Schools.

Authors:  Sean Joe; Heather Bryant
Journal:  Child Sch       Date:  2007-10-01

4.  The SOS Suicide Prevention Program: Further Evidence of Efficacy and Effectiveness.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Schilling; Robert H Aseltine; Amy James
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2016-02

5.  Factors in the assessment of suicidality in youth.

Authors:  Kelly Posner; Glenn A Melvin; Barbara Stanley; Maria A Oquendo; Madelyn Gould
Journal:  CNS Spectr       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.790

6.  The p4 screener: evaluation of a brief measure for assessing potential suicide risk in 2 randomized effectiveness trials of primary care and oncology patients.

Authors:  Priyanka Dube; Kroenke Kurt; Matthew J Bair; Dale Theobald; Linda S Williams
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2010

7.  Suicide acceptability is related to suicide planning in U.S. adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Sean Joe; Daniel Romer; Patrick E Jamieson
Journal:  Suicide Life Threat Behav       Date:  2007-04

8.  Prediction of suicide ideation and attempts among adolescents using a brief performance-based test.

Authors:  Matthew K Nock; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2007-10

9.  Ecological assessment of daily suicidal thoughts and attempts among suicidal teens after psychiatric hospitalization: Lessons about feasibility and acceptability.

Authors:  E K Czyz; C A King; I Nahum-Shani
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 10.  Negotiating the maze: risk factors for suicidal behavior in chronic pain patients.

Authors:  Toby R O Newton-John
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.