Literature DB >> 15811048

In vivo antimicrobial effectiveness of an essential oil-containing mouth rinse 12 h after a single use and 14 days' use.

D H Fine1, D Furgang, K Sinatra, C Charles, A McGuire, L D Kumar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Two studies were conducted to determine the antimicrobial effect of rinsing with an essential oil-containing mouth rinse 12 h after a single rinse and 12 h after 2 weeks of twice daily rinsing, during the daytime and overnight.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: These studies utilized a randomized, double-blind, controlled crossover design. Following baseline sampling of bacteria from supragingival plaque and the dorsum of the tongue, subjects began twice-daily rinsing with either an essential oil mouth rinse containing 0.09% zinc chloride (Tartar Control Listerine Antiseptic) or a negative control rinse. Bacterial sampling was repeated 12 h after the first rinse, and again 12 h after the final rinse 14 days later. The sampling schedule was adjusted according to whether the study was investigating daytime or overnight activity. Samples were plated on Schaedlers medium (total anaerobes), Schaedlers Nalidixic/Vancomycin medium (Gram-negative anaerobes), and OOPS medium (volatile sulphur compound (VSC)-producing organisms). Inter-group log10 transformed colony-forming units/ml counts from samples of supragingival plaque and tongue swabs on each of the three media were compared by analysis of covariance.
RESULTS: The mean bacterial counts in subjects using the essential oil mouth rinse were significantly lower (p< or =0.005) than mean counts in subjects using the control rinse in all the comparisons, i.e., tongue and supragingival plaque samples on each of three media at two sampling periods in the daytime and overnight study, respectively. Mean bacterial count percent reductions for plaque samples ranged from 56.3 to 95.3; percent reductions for tongue samples ranged from 61.1 to 96.1. There was a trend to higher reductions after 14 days' rinsing than after the initial rinse.
CONCLUSION: Rinsing with the essential oil mouth rinse can have long-lasting effects in reducing anaerobic bacteria overall as well as Gram-negative anaerobes and VSC-producing bacteria. The significant reductions in numbers of these bacteria produced by the essential oil mouth rinse, both in plaque and on the dorsum of the tongue, can play a key role in explaining the essential oil mouth rinse's effectiveness in reducing supragingival plaque and gingivitis as well as its effectiveness in controlling intrinsic oral malodor over prolonged periods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15811048     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2005.00674.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  11 in total

1.  In situ antimicrobial activity on oral biofilm: essential oils vs. 0.2 % chlorhexidine.

Authors:  Victor Quintas; Isabel Prada-López; Juan Carlos Prados-Frutos; Inmaculada Tomás
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Design of a protocol for obtaining genomic DNA from saliva using mouthwash: Samples taken from patients with periodontal disease.

Authors:  Ángel Chávez Mendoza; Beatriz Buentello Volante; María Esther Ocharán Hernández; Claudia Camelia Calzada Mendoza; Arturo Flores Pliego; Héctor A Baptista Gonzalez; Higinio Estrada Juárez
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2016-02-11

3.  The effect of Brazilian propolis type-3 against oral microbiota and volatile sulfur compounds in subjects with morning breath malodor.

Authors:  Marcelo de Faveri; Giselle Cancine Pupio; Hyun Koo; Bruno Bueno-Silva; Kelson Marinho de Oliveira; Luciene Cristina Figueiredo; Pedro Luiz Rosalen; Roberto Masayuki Hayacibara; Mitsue Fujimaki
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Clinical and microbiological effects of an essential-oil-containing mouth rinse applied in the "one-stage full-mouth disinfection" protocol--a randomized doubled-blinded preliminary study.

Authors:  Sheila Cavalca Cortelli; Fabiana Cavallini; Marcello Faria Regueira Alves; Arnaud Alves Bezerra; Celso Silva Queiroz; José Roberto Cortelli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Interventions for managing halitosis.

Authors:  Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj; Prashanti Eachempati; Eswara Uma; Vijendra Pal Singh; Noorliza Mastura Ismail; Eby Varghese
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-11

6.  Ex vivo vs. in vivo antibacterial activity of two antiseptics on oral biofilm.

Authors:  Isabel Prada-López; Víctor Quintas; Maria A Casares-De-Cal; Juan A Suárez-Quintanilla; David Suárez-Quintanilla; Inmaculada Tomás
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  Devices for In situ Development of Non-disturbed Oral Biofilm. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Isabel Prada-López; Víctor Quintas; Carlos Vilaboa; David Suárez-Quintanilla; Inmaculada Tomás
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Improved antimicrobial effect of ginseng extract by heat transformation.

Authors:  Peng Xue; Yang Yao; Xiu-Shi Yang; Jia Feng; Gui-Xing Ren
Journal:  J Ginseng Res       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 6.060

9.  Two Randomized Trials Demonstrate Lactic Acid Supplementation in Pet Food Inhibits Dental Plaque, Calculus, and Tooth Stain in Cats.

Authors:  Dale S Scherl; Lori Coffman; Stephen Davidson; Cheryl Stiers
Journal:  J Vet Dent       Date:  2019-09-29       Impact factor: 0.857

10.  Composition and Antibacterial Activity of the Essential Oils of Orthosiphon stamineus Benth and Ficus deltoidea Jack against Pathogenic Oral Bacteria.

Authors:  Nuramirah Azizan; Shahida Mohd Said; Zamirah Zainal Abidin; Ibrahim Jantan
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.