Literature DB >> 15810973

Ex vivo fracture resistance of direct resin composite complete crowns with and without posts on maxillary premolars.

W A Fokkinga1, A-M Le Bell, C M Kreulen, L V J Lassila, P K Vallittu, N H J Creugers.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate ex vivo the fracture resistance and failure mode of direct resin composite complete crowns with and without various root canal posts made on maxillary premolars.
METHODOLOGY: The clinical crowns of 40 human extracted single-rooted maxillary premolars were sectioned at the cemento-enamel junction. The canals were prepared with Gates Glidden drills up to size 4. Thirty samples were provided with standardized post spaces in the palatal canal and all roots were embedded in acrylic. Minimal standardized preparations in the canal entrances were made. Groups of 10 samples were treated with (i) prefabricated metal posts, (ii) prefabricated glass fibre posts, (iii) custom-made glass fibre posts, and (iv) no posts (control). Posts were cemented with resin cement and resin composite complete crowns were made. All specimens were thermocycled (6000x, 5-55 degrees C). Static load until fracture was applied using a universal loading device (crosshead speed 5 mm min(-1)) at a loading angle of 30 degrees . Failure modes were categorized as favourable and unfavourable failures.
RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the mean failure loads (group 1: 1386 N, group 2: 1276 N, group 3: 1281 N, and group 4: 1717 N, P > 0.05), nor between frequencies of failure modes (P > 0.05). All failures were fractures of the resin composite crown in combination with tooth material (cohesive failures).
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this laboratory investigation it is concluded that severely damaged and root filled maxillary premolars, restored with direct resin composite complete crowns without posts have similar fracture resistances and failure modes compared to those with various posts, which suggest that posts are not necessarily required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15810973     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00941.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  11 in total

1.  Dental practice in the UK in 2015/2016. Part 3: aspects of indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics.

Authors:  A A Jum'ah; S Creanor; N H F Wilson; F J T Burke; P A Brunton
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  The effect of the post length and cusp coverage on the cycling and static load of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.

Authors:  Nicola Scotti; Marco Scansetti; Riccardo Rota; Francesco Pera; Damiano Pasqualini; Elio Berutti
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Does an intracanal composite anchorage replace posts?

Authors:  Gabriel Krastl; Andres Izquierdo; Leonard Büttel; Nicola U Zitzmann; Marc Schmitter; Roland Weiger
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Influence of different restorative techniques on the strength of endodontically treated weakened roots.

Authors:  Khalid H Alsamadani; El-Sayed Mohammed Abdaziz; El-Sayed Gad
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-05-14

5.  Fatigue resistance, debonding force, and failure type of fiber-reinforced composite, polyethylene ribbon-reinforced, and braided stainless steel wire lingual retainers in vitro.

Authors:  Dave Lie Sam Foek; Enver Yetkiner; Mutlu Ozcan
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Effect of ferrule on the fracture resistance of mandibular premolars with prefabricated posts and cores.

Authors:  Ae-Ra Kim; Hyun-Pil Lim; Hong-So Yang; Sang-Won Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Influence of ferrule preparation with or without glass fiber post on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  Alexandra Furtado de Lima; Aloísio Oro Spazzin; Daniel Galafassi; Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho; Bruno Carlini-Júnior
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  Effect of photo core, LuxaCore, and core max II core building materials on fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced composite posts and ParaPosts.

Authors:  Alireza Izadi; Bijan Heidari; Farnoush Fotovat; Armaghan Shahbazi; Hanif Allahbakhshi; Ghodratollah Roshanaei; Zohre Farhangian; Kioumars Kiani
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-08-14

9.  Effect of different luting cements on fracture resistance in endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  Narmin Mohammadi; Amir Ahmad Ajami; Soodabeh Kimyai; Mojdeh Rezaei Aval
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2008-10-01

10.  Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer.

Authors:  Fereshteh Shafiei; Maryam Sadat Tavangar; Yasamin Ghahramani; Zahra Fattah
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.