S Leinung1, R Ott, E Schuster, U Eichfeld. 1. Zentrum für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig. Steffen.Leinung@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tracheobronchial ruptures are rare surgical emergencies with significant mortality. We present management and outcome of such ruptures treated at the University of Leipzig in Germany and propose a novel therapeutic algorithm-a new classification system for stratifying treatment of patients with tracheobronchial ruptures. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 24 patients 19 to 88 years old who were treated in our institution for tracheobronchial injury. RESULTS: Eighty-seven percent of the injuries were caused iatrogenically. Fifty-four percent were type I injuries (isolated tracheal lesions), 38% type II (involvement of carina or main stem bronchi), and 8% type III (distal lesions of lobar or segmental bronchi). Seventy-five percent of the patients were operated via right-sided dorsolateral thoracotomy. In four (22%), insufficiency of the tracheal closure occurred, with mediastinitis possibly being a significant risk factor for this event (P<0.001). In surgically treated patients, rupture-related and overall mortality were 5.5% and 28%, respectively, whereas in medically treated patients, mortality was 33%. CONCLUSION: The proposed classification of tracheobronchial injuries enables stratifying the treatment of patients with tracheobronchial ruptures. Type I lesions can be surgically closed either by a right-sided thoracotomy or transcervical-transtracheal approach. In contrast, surgical management of type II and III injuries always requires thoracotomy.
BACKGROUND:Tracheobronchial ruptures are rare surgical emergencies with significant mortality. We present management and outcome of such ruptures treated at the University of Leipzig in Germany and propose a novel therapeutic algorithm-a new classification system for stratifying treatment of patients with tracheobronchial ruptures. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 24 patients 19 to 88 years old who were treated in our institution for tracheobronchial injury. RESULTS: Eighty-seven percent of the injuries were caused iatrogenically. Fifty-four percent were type I injuries (isolated tracheal lesions), 38% type II (involvement of carina or main stem bronchi), and 8% type III (distal lesions of lobar or segmental bronchi). Seventy-five percent of the patients were operated via right-sided dorsolateral thoracotomy. In four (22%), insufficiency of the tracheal closure occurred, with mediastinitis possibly being a significant risk factor for this event (P<0.001). In surgically treated patients, rupture-related and overall mortality were 5.5% and 28%, respectively, whereas in medically treated patients, mortality was 33%. CONCLUSION: The proposed classification of tracheobronchial injuries enables stratifying the treatment of patients with tracheobronchial ruptures. Type I lesions can be surgically closed either by a right-sided thoracotomy or transcervical-transtracheal approach. In contrast, surgical management of type II and III injuries always requires thoracotomy.
Authors: Manuel F Struck; Gunther Hempel; Uta C Pietsch; Johannes Broschewitz; Uwe Eichfeld; Robert Werdehausen; Sebastian Krämer Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2019-10-27 Impact factor: 2.217