Literature DB >> 15809773

Risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter lacerations.

Vani Dandolu1, Ashwin Chatwani, Ozgur Harmanli, Clara Floro, John P Gaughan, Enrique Hernandez.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify the rate of anal sphincter lacerations in a large population-based database and analyze risk factors associated with this condition. Data were obtained from Pennsylvania Healthcare Cost Containment Council (PHC4) regarding all cases of obstetrical third and fourth degree perineal lacerations that occurred during a 2-year period from January 1990 to December 1991. Modifiable risk factors associated with this condition were analyzed, specifically episiotomy, forceps-assisted vaginal delivery, forceps with episiotomy, vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, and vacuum with episiotomy. There were a total of 168,337 deliveries in 1990 and 165,051 deliveries in 1991 in Pennsylvania. Twenty-two percent (n = 74,881) of the deliveries were by cesarean section and were excluded from analysis. Among the remaining 258,507 deliveries, there were 18,888 (7.3%) third and fourth degree lacerations. Instrumental vaginal delivery, particularly with use of episiotomy, increased the risk of laceration significantly [forceps odds ratio (OR): 3.84, forceps with episiotomy OR: 3.89, vacuum OR: 2.58, vacuum with episiotomy OR: 2.93]. Episiotomy on the whole was associated with a threefold increase in the risk of sphincter tears. However, episiotomy in the absence of instrumental delivery seems to be protective with an OR of 0.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-0.93]. Instrumental vaginal delivery, particularly forceps delivery, appears to be an important risk factor for anal sphincter tears. The risk previously attributed to episiotomy is probably due to its association with instrumental vaginal delivery. Forceps delivery is associated with higher occurrence of anal sphincter injury compared to vacuum delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15809773     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-005-1297-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  7 in total

1.  Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery.

Authors:  J W de Leeuw; P C Struijk; M E Vierhout; H C Wallenburg
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations.

Authors:  V L Handa; B H Danielsen; W M Gilbert
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Births: preliminary data for 1999.

Authors:  S C Curtin; J A Martin
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2000-08-08

4.  Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: a systematic review.

Authors:  E Eason; M Labrecque; G Wells; P Feldman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Long-term ailments due to anal sphincter rupture caused by delivery--a hidden problem.

Authors:  K Haadem; S Ohrlander; G Lingman
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  Anal sphincter function after delivery rupture.

Authors:  K Haadem; J A Dahlstrom; L Ling; S Ohrlander
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Midline episiotomies: more harm than good?

Authors:  P Shiono; M A Klebanoff; J C Carey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 7.661

  7 in total
  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of Accuracy of Episiotomy Incision in a Governmental Maternity Unit in Palestine: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Hadil Y Ali-Masri; Sahar J Hassan; Kaled M Zimmo; Mohammed W Zimmo; Khaled M K Ismail; Erik Fosse; Hasan Alsalman; Åse Vikanes; Katariina Laine
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2018-10-29

2.  Decreased rate of obstetrical anal sphincter laceration is associated with change in obstetric practice.

Authors:  Steven M Minaglia; Begüm Ozel; Nicole M Gatto; Lisa Korst; Daniel R Mishell; David A Miller
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-03-28

3.  Risk factors for birth canal lacerations in primiparous women.

Authors:  Rafael T Mikolajczyk; Jun Zhang; James Troendle; Linda Chan
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Structured hands-on workshop decreases the over-detection rate of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries.

Authors:  Haim Krissi; Amir Aviram; Liran Hiersch; Eran Ashwal; Ram Eitan; Yoav Peled
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Severe perineal laceration during operative vaginal delivery: the impact of occiput posterior position.

Authors:  E Hirsch; R Elue; A Wagner; K Nelson; R K Silver; Y Zhou; M G Adams
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  Factors associated with anal sphincter laceration in 40,923 primiparous women.

Authors:  Peter Baumann; Ahmad O Hammoud; Samuel Gene McNeeley; Elizabeth DeRose; Bela Kudish; Susan Hendrix
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-01-09

7.  Postpartum anal sphincter lacerations in a population with minimal exposure to episiotomy and operative vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Cindi Lewis; Alana M Williams; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-06-07

8.  Obstetric anal sphincter injuries in vaginal delivery of twins: associated risk factors and comparison with singletons.

Authors:  Shay Porat; David Baud; Dan Farine
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Trigonometric characteristics of episiotomy and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in operative vaginal delivery.

Authors:  E Gonzalez-Díaz; L Moreno Cea; A Fernández Corona
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  A prior cesarean section and incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Authors:  Sari Räisänen; Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen; Rufus Cartwright; Mika Gissler; Seppo Heinonen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.