Literature DB >> 15807370

A random-ray model for speed and accuracy in perceptual experiments.

Adam Reeves1, Nayantara Santhi, Stefano Decaro.   

Abstract

We present a 'random ray' model to describe Yes/No reaction times (RTs) and errors in perceptual experiments. The ray model is analogous to a random walk, but it is computationally simpler, requiring only elementary geometry. Ray parameters control the drift rates to the Yes and No decision boundaries, bias, and a termination or 'time-out' rule. Rays are normally distributed, but predicted RT distributions are skewed by projection onto the boundaries. Model parameters can be estimated directly from the 16th, 50th, and 84th percentiles of the RT distributions on hit, correct rejection, false alarm, and miss trials, if the data satisfy three easily testable constraints. Examples are given from visual search and object recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15807370     DOI: 10.1163/1568568052801582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spat Vis        ISSN: 0169-1015


  7 in total

1.  What are the shapes of response time distributions in visual search?

Authors:  Evan M Palmer; Todd S Horowitz; Antonio Torralba; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Han L J van der Maas; Raoul P P P Grasman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

3.  Varying target prevalence reveals two dissociable decision criteria in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Michael J Van Wert
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Domain general mechanisms of perceptual decision making in human cortex.

Authors:  Tiffany C Ho; Scott Brown; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Deciding not to decide: computational and neural evidence for hidden behavior in sequential choice.

Authors:  Sebastian Gluth; Jörg Rieskamp; Christian Büchel
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Payoff Information Biases a Fast Guess Process in Perceptual Decision Making under Deadline Pressure: Evidence from Behavior, Evoked Potentials, and Quantitative Model Comparison.

Authors:  Sharareh Noorbaloochi; Dahlia Sharon; James L McClelland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Value-based decision making via sequential sampling with hierarchical competition and attentional modulation.

Authors:  Jaron T Colas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.