BACKGROUND: Although inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are effective in preventing deterioration in asthma control, at least half of subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma will remain stable when these agents are discontinued. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether noninvasive markers of inflammation predict which individuals maintain asthma control after discontinuation of ICSs. METHODS: We analyzed data obtained from 164 subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma who participated in a 16-week trial comparing the effects of continued ICS use with the effects of a switch to salmeterol or placebo. RESULTS: In comparison with continued ICS use, a switch to salmeterol or placebo was associated with increased rates of asthma deterioration over 16 weeks (9.3% vs 24.1% and 37.5%, respectively; P = .04 and P < .001, respectively). We found that neither exhaled nitric oxide nor methacholine PC 20 , when measured at randomization or 2 weeks after randomization, were significant predictors of subsequent asthma control in subjects who discontinued ICSs. However, both induced sputum eosinophil counts measured 2 weeks after a switch from ICS to placebo and changes in sputum eosinophil counts from before cessation of ICSs to after a switch to placebo predicted subsequent asthma deterioration (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.771 [ P < .001] and 0.825 [ P < .001], respectively). CONCLUSION: On the basis of a model treatment strategy, we estimate that allocating subjects to ICS therapy on the basis of changes in sputum eosinophil counts after a trial discontinuation could allow 48% of subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma to discontinue ICS therapy without an increased risk of asthma deterioration over a period of at least 14 weeks.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Although inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are effective in preventing deterioration in asthma control, at least half of subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma will remain stable when these agents are discontinued. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether noninvasive markers of inflammation predict which individuals maintain asthma control after discontinuation of ICSs. METHODS: We analyzed data obtained from 164 subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma who participated in a 16-week trial comparing the effects of continued ICS use with the effects of a switch to salmeterol or placebo. RESULTS: In comparison with continued ICS use, a switch to salmeterol or placebo was associated with increased rates of asthma deterioration over 16 weeks (9.3% vs 24.1% and 37.5%, respectively; P = .04 and P < .001, respectively). We found that neither exhaled nitric oxide nor methacholine PC 20 , when measured at randomization or 2 weeks after randomization, were significant predictors of subsequent asthma control in subjects who discontinued ICSs. However, both induced sputum eosinophil counts measured 2 weeks after a switch from ICS to placebo and changes in sputum eosinophil counts from before cessation of ICSs to after a switch to placebo predicted subsequent asthma deterioration (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.771 [ P < .001] and 0.825 [ P < .001], respectively). CONCLUSION: On the basis of a model treatment strategy, we estimate that allocating subjects to ICS therapy on the basis of changes in sputum eosinophil counts after a trial discontinuation could allow 48% of subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma to discontinue ICS therapy without an increased risk of asthma deterioration over a period of at least 14 weeks.
Authors: Richard J Martin; Stanley J Szefler; Tonya S King; Monica Kraft; Homer A Boushey; Vernon M Chinchilli; Timothy J Craig; Emily A Dimango; Aaron Deykin; John V Fahy; Elliot Israel; Stephen C Lazarus; Robert F Lemanske; Frank T Leone; Gene R Pesola; Stephen P Peters; Christine A Sorkness; Lisa A Szwejbka; Michael E Wechsler Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Kelly Wong McGrath; Nikolina Icitovic; Homer A Boushey; Stephen C Lazarus; E Rand Sutherland; Vernon M Chinchilli; John V Fahy Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Stephen C Lazarus; Jerry A Krishnan; Tonya S King; Jason E Lang; Kathryn V Blake; Ronina Covar; Njira Lugogo; Sally Wenzel; Vernon M Chinchilli; David T Mauger; Anne-Marie Dyer; Homer A Boushey; John V Fahy; Prescott G Woodruff; Leonard B Bacharier; Michael D Cabana; Juan C Cardet; Mario Castro; James Chmiel; Loren Denlinger; Emily DiMango; Anne M Fitzpatrick; Deborah Gentile; Annette Hastie; Fernando Holguin; Elliot Israel; Daniel Jackson; Monica Kraft; Craig LaForce; Robert F Lemanske; Fernando D Martinez; Wendy Moore; Wayne J Morgan; James N Moy; Ross Myers; Stephen P Peters; Wanda Phipatanakul; Jacqueline A Pongracic; Loretta Que; Kristie Ross; Lewis Smith; Stanley J Szefler; Michael E Wechsler; Christine A Sorkness Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-05-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jose Belda; Krishnan Parameswaran; Catherine Lemière; Dennis Kamada; Paul M O'Byrne; Frederick E Hargreave Journal: Can Respir J Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 2.409
Authors: Douglas C Cowan; D Robin Taylor; Laura E Peterson; Jan O Cowan; Rochelle Palmay; Avis Williamson; Jef Hammel; Serpil C Erzurum; Stanley L Hazen; Suzy A A Comhair Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2014-12-06 Impact factor: 10.793