OBJECTIVES: To analyze how the dental status of long-term head and neck cancer survivors affects their subjective quality of life. STUDY DESIGN: Observational case series. METHODS: A convenience sample of 5-year head and neck cancer survivors underwent the following battery of tests: 1) targeted head and neck examination, 2) updated medical history, 3) dental evaluation, 4) standardized quality of life questionnaires. RESULTS: Eighty-six survivors were included in the study. The following associations were identified: 1) those who became edentulous secondary to cancer treatment and those without occlusion at time of the study demonstrated worse Pain, Activity, Recreation/Entertainment, Chewing, Swallowing, Speech, Eating in Public, Normalcy of Diet, Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, and Additional Concerns scores; 2) higher Decayed/Missing/Filled scores were associated with worse Pain, Disfigurement, Activity, Recreation/Entertainment, Employment, Chewing, Swallowing, Speech, Eating in Public, Understandability of Speech, Normalcy of Diet, Physical Well-Being, Additional Concerns scores, and weight loss; 3) decreased oral opening measurements were associated with worse Chewing, Swallowing, Eating in Public, Normalcy of Diet, Additional Concerns scores, and weight loss; 4) edentulous survivors who did not use dentures had worse Pain, Activity, Recreation/Entertainment, Understandability of Speech, and Eating in Public scores. CONCLUSIONS: Although previous studies have shown that many of the effects of cancer treatment disappear between 1 and 3 years, this study shows that the dental status has a persistent impact on subjective quality of life.
OBJECTIVES: To analyze how the dental status of long-term head and neck cancer survivors affects their subjective quality of life. STUDY DESIGN: Observational case series. METHODS: A convenience sample of 5-year head and neck cancer survivors underwent the following battery of tests: 1) targeted head and neck examination, 2) updated medical history, 3) dental evaluation, 4) standardized quality of life questionnaires. RESULTS: Eighty-six survivors were included in the study. The following associations were identified: 1) those who became edentulous secondary to cancer treatment and those without occlusion at time of the study demonstrated worse Pain, Activity, Recreation/Entertainment, Chewing, Swallowing, Speech, Eating in Public, Normalcy of Diet, Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, and Additional Concerns scores; 2) higher Decayed/Missing/Filled scores were associated with worse Pain, Disfigurement, Activity, Recreation/Entertainment, Employment, Chewing, Swallowing, Speech, Eating in Public, Understandability of Speech, Normalcy of Diet, Physical Well-Being, Additional Concerns scores, and weight loss; 3) decreased oral opening measurements were associated with worse Chewing, Swallowing, Eating in Public, Normalcy of Diet, Additional Concerns scores, and weight loss; 4) edentulous survivors who did not use dentures had worse Pain, Activity, Recreation/Entertainment, Understandability of Speech, and Eating in Public scores. CONCLUSIONS: Although previous studies have shown that many of the effects of cancer treatment disappear between 1 and 3 years, this study shows that the dental status has a persistent impact on subjective quality of life.
Authors: Christina P C Sim; Joseph Wee; Ying Xu; Yin-Bun Cheung; Yoke-Lim Soong; David J Manton Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2014-09-27 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Hasan Husaini; Gintas P Krisciunas; Susan Langmore; Jacqueline K Mojica; Mark L Urken; Adam S Jacobson; Cathy L Lazarus Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2014-03-08 Impact factor: 3.438
Authors: Joel B Epstein; Catherine Hong; Richard M Logan; Andrei Barasch; Sharon M Gordon; Loree Oberle-Edwards; Lorree Oberlee-Edwards; Deborah McGuire; Joel J Napenas; Linda S Elting; Fred K L Spijkervet; Michael T Brennan Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-06-11 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Barbara A Head; Luke Heitz; Cynthia Keeney; John Myers; Savitri N Appana; Jamie L Studts; Jeffrey Bumpous; Mark Pfeifer Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-08-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Catherine H L Hong; Joel J Napeñas; Brian D Hodgson; Monique A Stokman; Vickie Mathers-Stauffer; Linda S Elting; Fred K L Spijkervet; Michael T Brennan Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 3.603