BACKGROUND: Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) devices may be well suited to splenectomy in cases of splenomegaly. METHODS: All cases of HALS for splenectomy between 1997 and 2001 were reviewed. Patient characteristics, operative details, and morbidity and mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: HALS for splenectomy was performed in 54 patients. A total of 39 patients with massive splenomegaly (MS) (>600 g) were identified. The average weight of the MS group was 1285 +/- 505 g. There was one (3%) conversion. Operative time was 159 +/- 65 min, estimated blood loss was 257 +/- 240 ml, and length of hospital stay was 5.4 +/- 2.9 days. Morbidity was limited to 13 patients (24%), and there were two postoperative mortalities (5.1%). CONCLUSIONS: HALS for splenectomy in the setting of splenomegaly is feasible and safe. For the surgeon considering a laparoscopic approach in the setting of splenomegaly, a hand-assisted technique is ideally suited for removal of the enlarged spleen.
BACKGROUND: Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) devices may be well suited to splenectomy in cases of splenomegaly. METHODS: All cases of HALS for splenectomy between 1997 and 2001 were reviewed. Patient characteristics, operative details, and morbidity and mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: HALS for splenectomy was performed in 54 patients. A total of 39 patients with massive splenomegaly (MS) (>600 g) were identified. The average weight of the MS group was 1285 +/- 505 g. There was one (3%) conversion. Operative time was 159 +/- 65 min, estimated blood loss was 257 +/- 240 ml, and length of hospital stay was 5.4 +/- 2.9 days. Morbidity was limited to 13 patients (24%), and there were two postoperative mortalities (5.1%). CONCLUSIONS: HALS for splenectomy in the setting of splenomegaly is feasible and safe. For the surgeon considering a laparoscopic approach in the setting of splenomegaly, a hand-assisted technique is ideally suited for removal of the enlarged spleen.
Authors: Kent W Kercher; Brent D Matthews; R Matthew Walsh; Ronald F Sing; Charles L Backus; B Todd Heniford Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: E M Targarona; E Gracia; J Garriga; C Martínez-Bru; M Cortés; R Boluda; L Lerma; M Trías Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2001-10-13 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Abdulmalik M S Altaf; James Ellsmere; Hendrik Jaap Bonjer; Tarek H El-Ghazaly; Dennis R Klassen Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Filippo Filicori; Cameron Stock; Andrew D Schweitzer; Xavier M Keutgen; Maria D Lagratta; Rasa Zarnegar; Thomas J Fahey Journal: World J Surg Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: B Habermalz; S Sauerland; G Decker; B Delaitre; J-F Gigot; E Leandros; K Lechner; M Rhodes; G Silecchia; A Szold; E Targarona; P Torelli; E Neugebauer Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2008-02-22 Impact factor: 4.584