Literature DB >> 15802675

A new model predicting locomotor cost from limb length via force production.

Herman Pontzer1.   

Abstract

Notably absent from the existing literature is an explicit biomechanical model linking limb design to the energy cost of locomotion, COL. Here, I present a simple model that predicts the rate of force production necessary to support the body and swing the limb during walking and running as a function of speed, limb length, limb proportion, excursion angle and stride frequency. The estimated rate of force production is then used to predict COL via this model following previous studies that have linked COL to force production. To test this model, oxygen consumption and kinematics were measured in nine human subjects while walking and running on a treadmill at range of speeds. Following the model, limb length, speed, excursion angle and stride frequency were used to predict the rate of force production both to support the body's center of mass and to swing the limb. Model-predicted COL was significantly correlated with observed COL, performing as well or better than contact time and Froude number as a predictor of COL for running and walking, respectively. Furthermore, the model presented here predicts relationships between COL, kinematic variables and body size that are supported by published reduced-gravity experiments and scaling studies. Results suggest the model is useful for predicting COL from anatomical and kinematic variables, and may be useful in intra- and inter-specific studies of locomotor anatomy and performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15802675     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  16 in total

1.  Mechanical efficiency of limb swing during walking and running in guinea fowl (Numida meleagris).

Authors:  Jonas Rubenson; Richard L Marsh
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-02-19

2.  Fifteen observations on the structure of energy-minimizing gaits in many simple biped models.

Authors:  Manoj Srinivasan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Behavioural function and development of body-to-limb proportions and active movement ranges in three stick insect species.

Authors:  Volker Dürr; Ago Mesanovic
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 2.389

4.  Partitioning the metabolic cost of human running: a task-by-task approach.

Authors:  Christopher J Arellano; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.326

5.  The energetic cost of walking: a comparison of predictive methods.

Authors:  Patricia Ann Kramer; Adam D Sylvester
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The metabolic cost of walking on an incline in the Peacock (Pavo cristatus).

Authors:  Holly Wilkinson; Nathan Thavarajah; Jonathan Codd
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Intraspecific scaling of the minimum metabolic cost of transport in leghorn chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus): links with limb kinematics, morphometrics and posture.

Authors:  Kayleigh A Rose; Robert L Nudds; Jonathan R Codd
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Body size and lower limb posture during walking in humans.

Authors:  Martin Hora; Libor Soumar; Herman Pontzer; Vladimír Sládek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A wider pelvis does not increase locomotor cost in humans, with implications for the evolution of childbirth.

Authors:  Anna G Warrener; Kristi L Lewton; Herman Pontzer; Daniel E Lieberman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Interactive effects of leg autotomy and incline on locomotor performance and kinematics of the cellar spider, Pholcus manueli.

Authors:  Gary W Gerald; Moriah M Thompson; Todd D Levine; Kerri M Wrinn
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.