Literature DB >> 15800739

Water turbidity affects predator-prey interactions in a fish-damselfly system.

Frank Van de Meutter1, Luc De Meester, Robby Stoks.   

Abstract

Community structure may differ dramatically between clear-water and turbid lakes. These differences have been attributed to differences in the cascading effect of fish on prey populations, owing to the reduced efficiency of fish predation in the presence of macrophytes. However, recent theoretical ideas suggest that water turbidity may shape predator-prey interactions, and it is predicted that prey will relax its antipredation behaviour in turbid water (H1). As a result, the nature of predator-prey interactions is expected to shift from both direct and indirect in clear water to dominantly direct in turbid water (H2). We tested these ideas in a fish-damselfly predator-prey system. In a first behavioural experiment, we looked at antipredation behaviour of damselfly larvae isolated from habitats that differ in turbidity, in the presence of fish in clear and turbid water. As predicted in H1, the larvae were more active in turbid than in clear water. In a complementary enclosure experiment, we reared larvae in a clear-water pond and a turbid pond, respectively, and manipulated the origin of the larvae (clear-water, turbid pond), fish presence (absent, present), and vegetation density (sparse, abundant). In both ponds, fish had a direct negative effect on survival of the larvae, which was mitigated in the presence of vegetation. In the fish treatment, the change in average body mass tended to be higher in the turbid pond than in the clear-water pond, suggesting indirect effects of fish were mitigated in the turbid pond. This was supported by a negative effect of fish on the effective growth rate of larvae in the clear pond, but not in the turbid pond. These results are compatible with the idea that predator-prey relationships are mainly governed by direct effects in turbid water, and by direct and indirect effects in clear water.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15800739     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0050-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Lack of preference for low-predation-risk habitats in larval damselflies explained by costs of intraspecific interactions.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Evolution of prey behavior in response to changes in predation regime: damselflies in fish and dragonfly lakes.

Authors:  R Stoks; M A McPeek; J L Mitchell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes.

Authors:  M Scheffer; S H Hosper; M L Meijer; B Moss; E Jeppesen
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Conflict between antipredator and antiparasite behaviour in larval damselflies.

Authors:  R L Baker; Bruce P Smith
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The growth/predation risk trade-off: so what is the mechanism?

Authors:  Mark A McPeek
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-04-26       Impact factor: 3.926

  5 in total
  8 in total

1.  Hydrodynamics affect predator controls through physical and sensory stressors.

Authors:  Jessica L Pruett; Marc J Weissburg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Effects of turbidity on the spontaneous and prey-searching activity of juvenile Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua).

Authors:  Justin J Meager; Robert S Batty
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Interactions of multiple predators with different foraging modes in an aquatic food web.

Authors:  Michael P Carey; David H Wahl
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Green crab (Carcinus maenas) foraging efficiency reduced by fast flows.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Robinson; Delbert L Smee; Geoffrey C Trussell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Visual Detection of Speckles in the Fish Xenotoca variata by the Predatory Snake Thamnophis melanogaster in Water of Different Turbidity.

Authors:  Javier Manjarrez; Eric Rivas-González; Crystian S Venegas-Barrera; Alejandro Moyaho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Native and non-native plants provide similar refuge to invertebrate prey, but less than artificial plants.

Authors:  Bart M C Grutters; Bart J A Pollux; Wilco C E P Verberk; Elisabeth S Bakker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Turbidity interferes with foraging success of visual but not chemosensory predators.

Authors:  Jessica Lunt; Delbert L Smee
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  The effect of turbidity on recognition and generalization of predators and non-predators in aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Douglas P Chivers; Fawaz Al-Batati; Grant E Brown; Maud C O Ferrari
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.