Literature DB >> 15800362

In the world of Dolly, when does a human embryo acquire respect?

C Cameron1, R Williamson.   

Abstract

For most of the 20th century, it was possible to regard fertilisation as the identifiable point when life begins, because this moment could be defined unequivocally and was thought to be the single most essential biological step in the establishment of a new human entity. Since the successful reproductive cloning of Dolly and other mammals, it is clear that any human cell has the potential to supply the full genome of an embryo, and hence a person, without going through fertilisation. At what point in time do such embryos acquire the respect accorded to human beings? The authors argue that the time of implantation is the most useful point at which the potential and the intention to create a new person are translated into reality, because from that point a new life develops. Implantation differentiates a somatic cell in culture (which is not due respect) from a human entity that has acquired its own identity and developmental potential. The authors examine the value of quickening or viability as alternative developmental stages in the process of acquiring respect for the Dolly embryo.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Religious Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15800362      PMCID: PMC1734124          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2003.006395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  9 in total

1.  Respecting what we destroy. Reflections on human embryo research.

Authors:  M J Meyer; L J Nelson
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Is there a "right not to be born"? Reproductive decision making, options and the right to information.

Authors:  J Savulescu
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  The new ethics of abortion.

Authors:  J Greenwood
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Abortion, embryo destruction and the future of value argument.

Authors:  J Savulescu
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Do human cells have rights?

Authors:  Mary Warnock
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 1.898

6.  Issues for service providers: a response to points raised.

Authors:  A Furedi
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Reproductive autonomy and the ethics of abortion.

Authors:  B Hewson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 8.  Is there a 'new ethics of abortion'?

Authors:  R Gillon
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Nuclei of adult mammalian somatic cells are directly reprogrammed to oct-4 stem cell gene expression by amphibian oocytes.

Authors:  James A Byrne; Stina Simonsson; Patrick S Western; John B Gurdon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 10.834

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  The moral status of the embryo post-Dolly.

Authors:  Catherine Stanton; John Harris
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  A natural stem cell therapy? How novel findings and biotechnology clarify the ethics of stem cell research.

Authors:  P Patel
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Consequentialism without consequences: ethics and embryo research.

Authors:  Sarah Chan; John Harris
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Embryonic stem cell patents and human dignity.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-03-29

Review 5.  How and Why to Replace the 14-Day Rule.

Authors:  Sarah Chan
Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Rep       Date:  2018-07-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.