Literature DB >> 15799576

Influence of visually induced self-motion on postural stability.

Hiroaki Fushiki1, Kenji Kobayashi, Masatsugu Asai, Yukio Watanabe.   

Abstract

CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the illusion of self-motion is a significant factor leading to spatial disorientation.
OBJECTIVE: Under normal circumstances, self-motion is perceived in response to motion of the head and body. However, under certain conditions, such as virtual reality environments, visually induced self-motion can be perceived even though the subject is not actually moving, a phenomenon known as "vection". The aim of this study was to examine the possible influence of illusory self-rotation (circular vection) on postural adjustments.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The subjects were 10 young females with no history of ocular or vestibular disease. Video-motion analysis was applied to measure postural movements during vertical optokinetic stimulation.
RESULTS: For most subjects, movement of the visual surroundings induced head and body displacements in the same direction as that of the visual stimulus, regardless of the onset of self-motion perception. However, there was a significant increase in postural instability after the subjects began to perceive false self-motion in the opposite direction to that of the visual stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15799576     DOI: 10.1080/00016480410015794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  12 in total

1.  Self versus environment motion in postural control.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Influence of pathologic and simulated visual dysfunctions on the postural system.

Authors:  Michaela Friedrich; Hans-Juergen Grein; Carola Wicher; Juliane Schuetze; Anja Mueller; Andreas Lauenroth; Kuno Hottenrott; Rene Schwesig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Combined effects of auditory and visual cues on the perception of vection.

Authors:  Behrang Keshavarz; Lawrence J Hettinger; Daniel Vena; Jennifer L Campos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Ventral and dorsal streams processing visual motion perception (FDG-PET study).

Authors:  Sandra Becker-Bense; Hans-Georg Buchholz; Peter zu Eulenburg; Christoph Best; Peter Bartenstein; Matthias Schreckenberger; Marianne Dieterich
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.288

5.  Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related?

Authors:  Behrang Keshavarz; Bernhard E Riecke; Lawrence J Hettinger; Jennifer L Campos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-20

6.  Comparing the effectiveness of different displays in enhancing illusions of self-movement (vection).

Authors:  Bernhard E Riecke; Jacqueline D Jordan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-01

7.  Interaction effects of visual stimulus speed and contrast on postural sway.

Authors:  Vivian Holten; Maarten J van der Smagt; Frans A J Verstraten; Stella F Donker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Postural responses to specific types of long-term memory during visually induced roll self-motion.

Authors:  Maëlle Tixier; Stéphane Rousset; Pierre-Alain Barraud; Corinne Cian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Illusionary self-motion perception in zebrafish.

Authors:  Ying-Yu Huang; Markus Tschopp; Stephan C F Neuhauss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of visually simulated roll motion on vection and postural stabilization.

Authors:  Shigehito Tanahashi; Hiroyasu Ujike; Ryo Kozawa; Kazuhiko Ukai
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.