Literature DB >> 15798268

Microionization chamber for reference dosimetry in IMRT verification: clinical implications on OAR dosimetric errors.

Francisco Sánchez-Doblado1, Roberto Capote, Antonio Leal, Joan V Roselló, Juan I Lagares, Rafael Arráns, Günther H Hartmann.   

Abstract

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has become a treatment of choice in many oncological institutions. Small fields or beamlets with sizes of 1 to 5 cm2 are now routinely used in IMRT delivery. Therefore small ionization chambers (IC) with sensitive volumes 0.1 cm3 are generally used for dose verification of an IMRT treatment. The measurement conditions during verification may be quite different from reference conditions normally encountered in clinical beam calibration, so dosimetry of these narrow photon beams pertains to the so-called non-reference conditions for beam calibration. This work aims at estimating the error made when measuring the organ at risk's (OAR) absolute dose by a micro ion chamber (microIC) in a typical IMRT treatment. The dose error comes from the assumption that the dosimetric parameters determining the absolute dose are the same as for the reference conditions. We have selected two clinical cases, treated by IMRT, for our dose error evaluations. Detailed geometrical simulation of the microIC and the dose verification set-up was performed. The Monte Carlo (MC) simulation allows us to calculate the dose measured by the chamber as a dose averaged over the air cavity within the ion-chamber active volume (D(air)). The absorbed dose to water (D(water)) is derived as the dose deposited inside the same volume, in the same geometrical position, filled and surrounded by water in the absence of the ion chamber. Therefore, the D(water)/D(air) dose ratio is the MC estimator of the total correction factor needed to convert the absorbed dose in air into the absorbed dose in water. The dose ratio was calculated for the microIC located at the isocentre within the OARs for both clinical cases. The clinical impact of the calculated dose error was found to be negligible for the studied IMRT treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15798268     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/5/018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  3 in total

1.  The change of response of ionization chambers in the penumbra and transmission regions: impact for IMRT verification.

Authors:  D González-Castaño; J Pena; F Sánchez-Doblado; G H Hartmann; F Gómez; A Leal
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-09-08       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The effect of influence quantities and detector orientation on small-field patient-specific IMRT QA: comparison of measurements with various ionization chambers.

Authors:  Henry Finlay Godson; Ravikumar Manickam; Sathiyan Saminathan; Kadirampatti Mani Ganesh; Retna Ponmalar
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-12-01

3.  On the quantification of the dosimetric accuracy of collapsed cone convolution superposition (CCCS) algorithm for small lung volumes using IMRT.

Authors:  Oscar I Calvo; Alonso N Gutiérrez; Sotirios Stathakis; Carlos Esquivel; Nikos Papanikolaou
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.