Literature DB >> 15797914

Determining functional specificity from protein sequences.

Jason E Donald1, Eugene I Shakhnovich.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Given a large family of homologous protein sequences, many methods can divide the family into smaller groups that correspond to the different functions carried out by proteins within the family. One important problem, however, has been the absence of a general method for selecting an appropriate level of granularity, or size of the groups.
RESULTS: We propose a consistent way of choosing the granularity that is independent of the sequence similarity and sequence clustering method used. We study three large, well-investigated protein families: basic leucine zippers, nuclear receptors and proteins with three consecutive C2H2 zinc fingers. Our method is tested against known functional information, the experimentally determined binding specificities, using a simple scoring method. The significance of the groups is also measured by randomizing the data. Finally, we compare our algorithm against a popular method of grouping proteins, the TRIBE-MCL method. In the end, we determine that dividing the families at the proposed level of granularity creates very significant and useful groups of proteins that correspond to the different DNA-binding motifs. We expect that such groupings will be useful in studying not only DNA binding but also other protein interactions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15797914     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  12 in total

1.  Identifying critical residues in protein folding: Insights from phi-value and P(fold) analysis.

Authors:  P F N Faísca; R D M Travasso; R C Ball; E I Shakhnovich
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Sequence conservation in the prediction of catalytic sites.

Authors:  Yongchao Dou; Xingbo Geng; Hongyun Gao; Jialiang Yang; Xiaoqi Zheng; Jun Wang
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.371

3.  Networks of high mutual information define the structural proximity of catalytic sites: implications for catalytic residue identification.

Authors:  Cristina Marino Buslje; Elin Teppa; Tomas Di Doménico; José María Delfino; Morten Nielsen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Experimental identification of specificity determinants in the domain linker of a LacI/GalR protein: bioinformatics-based predictions generate true positives and false negatives.

Authors:  Sarah Meinhardt; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-12

5.  Objective sequence-based subfamily classifications of mouse homeodomains reflect their in vitro DNA-binding preferences.

Authors:  Miguel A Santos; Andrei L Turinsky; Serene Ong; Jennifer Tsai; Michael F Berger; Gwenael Badis; Shaheynoor Talukder; Andrew R Gehrke; Martha L Bulyk; Timothy R Hughes; Shoshana J Wodak
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Predicting specificity-determining residues in two large eukaryotic transcription factor families.

Authors:  Jason E Donald; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Characterization and prediction of residues determining protein functional specificity.

Authors:  John A Capra; Mona Singh
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  SDR: a database of predicted specificity-determining residues in proteins.

Authors:  Jason E Donald; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  INTREPID--INformation-theoretic TREe traversal for Protein functional site IDentification.

Authors:  Sriram Sankararaman; Kimmen Sjölander
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  High-Resolution Identification of Specificity Determining Positions in the LacI Protein Family Using Ensembles of Sub-Sampled Alignments.

Authors:  Roman Sloutsky; Kristen M Naegle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.