Literature DB >> 19044896

Identifying critical residues in protein folding: Insights from phi-value and P(fold) analysis.

P F N Faísca1, R D M Travasso, R C Ball, E I Shakhnovich.   

Abstract

We apply a simulational proxy of the phi-value analysis and perform extensive mutagenesis experiments to identify the nucleating residues in the folding "reactions" of two small lattice Go polymers with different native geometries. Our findings show that for the more complex native fold (i.e., the one that is rich in nonlocal, long-range bonds), mutation of the residues that form the folding nucleus leads to a considerably larger increase in the folding time than the corresponding mutations in the geometry that is predominantly local. These results are compared to data obtained from an accurate analysis based on the reaction coordinate folding probability P(fold) and on structural clustering methods. Our study reveals a complex picture of the transition state ensemble. For both protein models, the transition state ensemble is rather heterogeneous and splits up into structurally different populations. For the more complex geometry the identified subpopulations are actually structurally disjoint. For the less complex native geometry we found a broad transition state with microscopic heterogeneity. These findings suggest that the existence of multiple transition state structures may be linked to the geometric complexity of the native fold. For both geometries, the identification of the folding nucleus via the P(fold) analysis agrees with the identification of the folding nucleus carried out with the phi-value analysis. For the most complex geometry, however, the applied methodologies give more consistent results than for the more local geometry. The study of the transition state structure reveals that the nucleus residues are not necessarily fully native in the transition state. Indeed, it is only for the more complex geometry that two of the five critical residues show a considerably high probability of having all its native bonds formed in the transition state. Therefore, one concludes that, in general, the phi-value correlates with the acceleration/deceleration of folding induced by mutation, rather than with the degree of nativeness of the transition state, and that the "traditional" interpretation of phi-values may provide a more realistic picture of the structure of the transition state only for more complex native geometries.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19044896      PMCID: PMC2671670          DOI: 10.1063/1.2973624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  43 in total

1.  Identifying the protein folding nucleus using molecular dynamics.

Authors:  N V Dokholyan; S V Buldyrev; H E Stanley; E I Shakhnovich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Three key residues form a critical contact network in a protein folding transition state.

Authors:  M Vendruscolo; E Paci; C M Dobson; M Karplus
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Mechanism of protein folding.

Authors:  B Nölting; K Andert
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-11-15

4.  Transition states and the meaning of Phi-values in protein folding kinetics.

Authors:  S B Ozkan; I Bahar; K A Dill
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2001-09

5.  Comparison between long-range interactions and contact order in determining the folding rate of two-state proteins: application of long-range order to folding rate prediction.

Authors:  M M Gromiha; S Selvaraj
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-06-29       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Folding rate prediction using total contact distance.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Constructing, verifying, and dissecting the folding transition state of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 with all-atom simulations.

Authors:  L Li; E I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Time-resolved backbone desolvation and mutational hot spots in folding proteins.

Authors:  Ariel Fernández
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-06-01

9.  Interplay among tertiary contacts, secondary structure formation and side-chain packing in the protein folding mechanism: all-atom representation study of protein L.

Authors:  Cecilia Clementi; Angel E García; José N Onuchic
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-02-21       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Pathways to folding, nucleation events, and native geometry.

Authors:  Rui D M Travasso; Margarida M Telo da Gama; Patrícia F N Faísca
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-10-14       Impact factor: 3.488

View more
  6 in total

1.  Non-native interactions play an effective role in protein folding dynamics.

Authors:  Patrícia F N Faísca; Ana Nunes; Rui D M Travasso; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Constrained proper sampling of conformations of transition state ensemble of protein folding.

Authors:  Ming Lin; Jian Zhang; Hsiao-Mei Lu; Rong Chen; Jie Liang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Analysis of the free-energy surface of proteins from reversible folding simulations.

Authors:  Lucy R Allen; Sergei V Krivov; Emanuele Paci
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Why do protein folding rates correlate with metrics of native topology?

Authors:  Patrícia F N Faísca; Rui D M Travasso; Andrea Parisi; Antonio Rey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  How difficult is it to fold a knotted protein? In silico insights from surface-tethered folding experiments.

Authors:  Miguel A Soler; Patrícia F N Faísca
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sequence analysis on the information of folding initiation segments in ferredoxin-like fold proteins.

Authors:  Masanari Matsuoka; Takeshi Kikuchi
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2014-05-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.