Literature DB >> 15797774

Divergence eye movements are dependent on initial stimulus position.

Tara L Alvarez1, John L Semmlow, Claude Pedrono.   

Abstract

Previous studies on the speed and latency of convergence and divergence eye movements have produced varied, sometimes contradictory, results. Four subjects were studied and tracked 4 degrees disparity step changes for convergence and divergence at different initial target positions. Here we report that the dynamics of divergence movements not only differ from convergence movement, but depend on the initial vergence position. Velocities of divergence eye movements in response to targets that were initially near to the subject were approximately twice that of responses to initially distant targets and also exhibited shorter temporal properties. Hence, while convergence responses are fairly similar irrespective of the initial position, divergence dynamic and temporal properties are dependent on the initial stimulus position. It is speculated that the differences observed in divergence may be the result of nonlinear properties of the extraocular muscles or a difference in the underlying neural controller potentially a difference in the magnitude of the fusion initiating component of divergence.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15797774     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

1.  Capturing the Moment of Fusion Loss in Intermittent Exotropia.

Authors:  John R Economides; Daniel L Adams; Jonathan C Horton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Dynamic control of ocular disaccommodation: first and second-order dynamics.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The Convergence Insufficiency Neuro-mechanism in Adult Population Study (CINAPS) Randomized Clinical Trial: Design, Methods, and Clinical Data.

Authors:  Tara L Alvarez; Mitchell Scheiman; Elio M Santos; Cristian Morales; Chang Yaramothu; John Vito D'Antonio-Bertagnolli; Bharat B Biswal; Suril Gohel; Xiaobo Li
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 1.648

4.  Accommodative and vergence responses to conflicting blur and disparity stimuli during development.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Sustained fixation induced changes in phoria and convergence peak velocity.

Authors:  Eun H Kim; Vincent R Vicci; Sang J Han; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of visual distractors on vergence eye movements.

Authors:  Chang Yaramothu; Elio M Santos; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Dynamics of the Disparity Vergence Fusion Sustain Component.

Authors:  John L Semmlow; Chang Yaramothu; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 0.957

8.  A pilot study of disparity vergence and near dissociated phoria in convergence insufficiency patients before vs. after vergence therapy.

Authors:  Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Disparity vergence responses before versus after repetitive vergence therapy in binocularly normal controls.

Authors:  Henry Talasan; Mitchell Scheiman; Xiaobo Li; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Quantitative Approach for the Analysis of Fusional Convergence Using Eye-Tracking and SacLab Toolbox.

Authors:  Laura Cercenelli; Michela Fresina; Barbara Bortolani; Guido Tiberi; Giuseppe Giannaccare; E C Campos; Emanuela Marcelli
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-07-22       Impact factor: 2.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.