Literature DB >> 15797484

Influence of a probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain on development of the immune system of sows and piglets.

L Scharek1, J Guth, K Reiter, K D Weyrauch, D Taras, P Schwerk, P Schierack, M F G Schmidt, L H Wieler, K Tedin.   

Abstract

The influence of the probiotic bacterium Enterococcus faecium SF68 on the immune system and the intestinal colonization of pigs were determined in a feeding experiment with sows and piglets. Mucosal immunity of the developing piglets was monitored by isolation and detection of intestinal lymphocyte cell populations from the proximal jejunal epithelium and the continuous Peyers patches by the use of flow cytometry. The levels of intestinal IgA in both groups of piglets were compared, as well as total IgG in the serum of sows and piglets. Feces of the sows and intestinal contents of the piglets were taken for determination of total anaerobe and coliform bacterial counts in both probiotic and control groups. Villus length and depth of the crypts were measured in the jejunum of sacrificed piglets to monitor the development of the intestinal mucosal surface amplification. Total serum IgG of the sows appeared to be unaffected. Piglets of both groups showed similar IgG levels up to 5 weeks after birth with a slight tendency toward lower values in the probiotic group. At an age of 8 weeks the total IgG levels of the probiotic animals were significantly lower (p<0.01). No differences were observed in the populations of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the Peyers patches. However, the levels of cytotoxic T cells (CD8+) in the jejunal epithelium of piglets of the probiotic group were significantly reduced. The depth of the jejunal crypts and length of the villi were similar in both groups, suggesting the relative T-cell population differences were not due to alterations in the epithelial cell numbers. The total anaerobe and coliform bacterial populations were not significantly affected by the probiotic treatment, either in sows or in the piglets. However, a remarkable decline in the frequency of beta-haemolytic and O141 serovars of Escherichia coli was observed in the intestinal contents of probiotic piglets, suggesting an explanation for the reduction in cytotoxic T-cell populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15797484     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol        ISSN: 0165-2427            Impact factor:   2.046


  43 in total

1.  Feeding the probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain NCIMB 10415 to piglets specifically reduces the number of Escherichia coli pathotypes that adhere to the gut mucosa.

Authors:  Carmen Bednorz; Sebastian Guenther; Kathrin Oelgeschläger; Bianca Kinnemann; Robert Pieper; Susanne Hartmann; Karsten Tedin; Torsten Semmler; Konrad Neumann; Peter Schierack; Astrid Bethe; Lothar H Wieler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Nonstarch polysaccharides modulate bacterial microbiota, pathways for butyrate production, and abundance of pathogenic Escherichia coli in the pig gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli; Seema Hooda; Robert Pieper; Ruurd T Zijlstra; Andrew G van Kessel; Rainer Mosenthin; Michael G Gänzle
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Changes in the colon microbiota and intestinal cytokine gene expression following minimal intestinal surgery.

Authors:  Susan Lapthorne; Julie E Bines; Fiona Fouhy; Nicole L Dellios; Guineva Wilson; Sarah L Thomas; Michelle Scurr; Catherine Stanton; Paul D Cotter; Prue M Pereira-Fantini
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Virulence factor gene profiles of Escherichia coli isolates from clinically healthy pigs.

Authors:  Peter Schierack; Hartmut Steinrück; Sylvia Kleta; Wilfried Vahjen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Enterococci from piglets--probiotic properties and responsiveness to natural antibacterial substances.

Authors:  V Strompfová; A Lauková
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 2.099

6.  Effects of a probiotic strain of Enterococcus faecium on the rate of natural chlamydia infection in swine.

Authors:  M Pollmann; M Nordhoff; A Pospischil; K Tedin; L H Wieler
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Effects of Ex Vivo Infection with ETEC on Jejunal Barrier Properties and Cytokine Expression in Probiotic-Supplemented Pigs.

Authors:  Ulrike Lodemann; Salah Amasheh; Judith Radloff; Martina Kern; Astrid Bethe; Lothar H Wieler; Robert Pieper; Jürgen Zentek; Jörg R Aschenbach
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Influence of a probiotic strain of Enterococcus faecium on Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 infection in a porcine animal infection model.

Authors:  István Szabó; Lothar H Wieler; Karsten Tedin; Lydia Scharek-Tedin; David Taras; Andreas Hensel; Bernd Appel; Karsten Nöckler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Evaluation of safety and probiotic properties of a strain of Enterococcus faecium isolated from chicken bile.

Authors:  Youfei Shi; Mengkai Zhai; Jinlian Li; Baoquan Li
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.701

10.  Intestinal colonization with Enterococcus faecium does not influence pulmonary defense against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in mice.

Authors:  Masja Leendertse; Rob J L Willems; Ida A J Giebelen; Joris J T H Roelofs; Janetta Top; Marc J M Bonten; Tom van der Poll
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.