OBJECT: The authors describe the preoperative assessment, intraoperative strategies, and long-term outcomes in 41 consecutive patients who underwent spinal reconstruction after resection of subaxial cervical neoplasms. METHODS: Thirty-three tumors were metastatic and eight were primary. Preoperative studies included direct laryngoscopy and vertebral artery (VA) balloon occlusion tests in selected patients. Based on the tumor location, approaches included 12 anterior, 13 posterior, and 16 combined. All patients underwent aggressive intralesional resection and spinal reconstruction. In 12 patients, the VA was dissected from the periphery of the tumor, two cases of which required ligation. Fibula allograft and an anterior rigid plate fixation were most commonly used for anterior reconstruction. Posterior reconstruction was initially performed using lateral mass plates (LMPs) in 13 patients and screw/rod systems in the remaining patients. At follow up, pain level improved to mild or was absent in 39 patients (95%) who had presented with moderate or severe pain. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Scale scores were stable in 25 patients who presented with ASIA Score E and improved in 14 patients (88%) who presented with ASIA Score B, C, or D. Functional radiculopathy significantly improved in 16 (94%) of 17 patients. Complications occurred in 10 patients (24%) and included three fixation failures requiring revision. Two fixation failures involved cervical LMP screw pullout. The overall mean survival duration was 8.6 months for patients with metastatic tumors and 33.4 months for primary tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for the treatment of subaxial spine neoplasms is effective for relieving pain, encouraging functional nerve root recovery, and preserving spinal cord function with acceptable complication rates.
OBJECT: The authors describe the preoperative assessment, intraoperative strategies, and long-term outcomes in 41 consecutive patients who underwent spinal reconstruction after resection of subaxial cervical neoplasms. METHODS: Thirty-three tumors were metastatic and eight were primary. Preoperative studies included direct laryngoscopy and vertebral artery (VA) balloon occlusion tests in selected patients. Based on the tumor location, approaches included 12 anterior, 13 posterior, and 16 combined. All patients underwent aggressive intralesional resection and spinal reconstruction. In 12 patients, the VA was dissected from the periphery of the tumor, two cases of which required ligation. Fibula allograft and an anterior rigid plate fixation were most commonly used for anterior reconstruction. Posterior reconstruction was initially performed using lateral mass plates (LMPs) in 13 patients and screw/rod systems in the remaining patients. At follow up, pain level improved to mild or was absent in 39 patients (95%) who had presented with moderate or severe pain. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Scale scores were stable in 25 patients who presented with ASIA Score E and improved in 14 patients (88%) who presented with ASIA Score B, C, or D. Functional radiculopathy significantly improved in 16 (94%) of 17 patients. Complications occurred in 10 patients (24%) and included three fixation failures requiring revision. Two fixation failures involved cervical LMP screw pullout. The overall mean survival duration was 8.6 months for patients with metastatic tumors and 33.4 months for primary tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for the treatment of subaxial spine neoplasms is effective for relieving pain, encouraging functional nerve root recovery, and preserving spinal cord function with acceptable complication rates.
Authors: Heiko Koller; Axel Hempfing; Frank Acosta; Michael Fox; Armin Scheiter; Mark Tauber; Ulrich Holz; Herbert Resch; Wolfgang Hitzl Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2008-01-26 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Athos Patsalides; Lewis Z Leng; David Kimball; Joshua Marcus; Jared Knopman; Ilya Laufer; Mark Bilsky; Y Pierre Gobin Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2016-03-27 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: Heiko Koller; Axel Hempfing; Luis Ferraris; Oliver Maier; Wolfgang Hitzl; Peter Metz-Stavenhagen Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2007-06-29 Impact factor: 3.134