Literature DB >> 15796103

Effect of stimulation rate on speech perception in adult users of the Med-El CIS speech processing strategy.

C A Verschuur1.   

Abstract

The primary aim of the study was to determine the effect of altering channel stimulation rate on the performance of adult cochlear implant users. Six adult users of the Med-El CIS processing strategy underwent tests of categorical identification of synthetic speech, tests of sentence recognition and tests of consonant recognition in three listening conditions: high channel stimulation rate (ranging from 1500 to 2020 pps/ch), a medium rate (800 pps/ch) and a low rate (400 pps/ch). Number of channels was held constant across rate conditions. With the categorical identification task, performance varied by acoustic cue type but did not vary with rate. With the consonant recognition task performance varied by phonological feature, but there was also no significant effect of rate. However, two subjects showed markedly reduced sentence scores at lower rates. Results suggests that higher stimulation rates with the CIS strategy may be beneficial to speech perception in some cases.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15796103     DOI: 10.1080/14992020400022488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  10 in total

1.  Effect of stimulation rate on cochlear implant users' phoneme, word and sentence recognition in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon; Rachel J Cruz; John J Galvin
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 2.  Temporal Considerations for Stimulating Spiral Ganglion Neurons with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jason Boulet; Mark White; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

3.  Characteristics of detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels as a function of pulse rate in human cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Li Xu; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Spatial Release From Masking in Adults With Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Effects of Distracter Azimuth and Microphone Location.

Authors:  Timothy J Davis; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Laser stimulation of single auditory nerve fibers.

Authors:  Philip D Littlefield; Irena Vujanovic; Jagmeet Mundi; Agnella Izzo Matic; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Within-subjects comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 speech processing strategies: speech perception and its relation to place-pitch sensitivity.

Authors:  Gail S Donaldson; Patricia K Dawson; Lamar Z Borden
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Effect of ECAP-based choice of stimulation rate on speech-perception performance.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bournique; Michelle L Hughes; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The effect of a coding strategy that removes temporally masked pulses on speech perception by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Wiebke Lamping; Tobias Goehring; Jeremy Marozeau; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Unanesthetized auditory cortex exhibits multiple codes for gaps in cochlear implant pulse trains.

Authors:  Alana E Kirby; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-04

10.  Effects of electrical stimulation rate on speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Sung Hye Park; Eunoak Kim; Hyo-Jeong Lee; Hyung-Jong Kim
Journal:  Korean J Audiol       Date:  2012-04-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.