Literature DB >> 15795727

Suggestions for improving the reporting of clinical research: the role of narrative.

David L Schriger1.   

Abstract

This article discusses the importance of narrative in reports of medical research. Stripped of all jargon and analytic technique, a scientific investigation is a story, and it is the nuances and details of the story that make it interpretable. While guidelines such as CONSORT have greatly improved the reporting of research, such guidelines are insufficient to ensure a meaningful reporting. The provision of explanatory narrative is essential. In this article, I propose that authors and journals exploit opportunities created by the worldwide Web to post supplementary material regarding their conception of the investigation, their execution of the study, their assumptions and limitations, and their rationale for any modeling efforts. I provide examples of how such narrative could be included in reports of randomized trials, observational studies, and studies of diagnostic tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15795727     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  9 in total

1.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-20

3.  [The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting of observational studies].

Authors:  E von Elm; D G Altman; M Egger; S J Pocock; P C Gøtzsche; J P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Reporting guidelines: optimal use in preventive medicine and public health.

Authors:  Karyn Popham; William A Calo; Melissa Y Carpentier; Naomi E Chen; Samira A Kamrudin; Yen-Chi L Le; Katherine A Skala; Logan R Thornton; Patricia Dolan Mullen
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  What medical writing means to me.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wager
Journal:  Mens Sana Monogr       Date:  2007-01

6.  From ideas to studies: how to get ideas and sharpen them into research questions.

Authors:  Jan P Vandenbroucke; Neil Pearce
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 7.  The STROBE guidelines.

Authors:  Sarah Cuschieri
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2019-04

8.  Response to comments on: Validating tablet perimetry against standard Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer for glaucoma screening in Indian population.

Authors:  Parul Ichhpujani; Sahil Thakur; Roopjit K Sahi; Suresh Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 9.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 11.069

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.