Literature DB >> 15795408

Effects of making emergency contraception available without a physician's prescription: a population-based study.

Judith A Soon1, Marc Levine, Brenda L Osmond, Mary H H Ensom, David W Fielding.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Timely access to emergency contraception has the potential to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies and subsequent abortions. A public health policy initiative in British Columbia beginning in December 2000 allowed pharmacists to provide emergency contraceptives (ECs) without a prescription. We sought to determine changes in EC use after the policy was introduced and to analyze EC use with data generated by the policy.
METHODS: All Ovral, Preven and Plan B EC prescriptions from Jan. 1, 1996, to Dec. 31, 2003, were identified through the BC PharmaNet and Medical Services Plan administrative databases and the data analyzed to determine changes between 1996 and 2002. Changes over time were determined in the frequency of EC provision, choice of EC agent, frequency of EC use by age group, repeat use and geographic distribution of EC prescription for the pre- and post-policy periods. Anonymized patient-specific data from treatment consent forms were used to describe the reason for EC use, interval between unprotected intercourse and EC prescription, proportion prescribed for immediate or future use, referrals for regular birth control and STD screening and concomitant antiemetic use. Consent data also provided the time in the menstrual cycle that the EC was requested.
RESULTS: The number of EC prescriptions increased from a pre-policy mean of 8805 (99% confidence interval 7823-9787) in the years 1996 to 2000 to a post-policy total in 2002 of 17 794. Physicians prescribed the levonorgestrel regimen (Plan B) less frequently than did pharmacists. The frequency of EC use was highest among women aged 20-24 years across all study years, and all age groups demonstrated a post-policy increase in use. On average, 2.1% of the women received an EC 3 or more times a year over the period of the study. More women in urban regions received ECs than women in more rural areas of the province. Analysis of pharmacist treatment consent forms used in 2001 and 2002 showed that 56.2% of women receiving an EC reported using a method of birth control that had failed, 55.7% of pharmacist-provided ECs were obtained within 24 hours after unprotected intercourse, 1.1% of ECs were obtained for future use, antiemetics were provided to 57.7% of women receiving the Yuzpe regimen (Ovral, Preven) and to 20.5% of women receiving levonorgestrel, and women tended to seek ECs when unprotected intercourse occurred at the time of highest risk of pregnancy in their menstrual cycle. Women in greatest financial need obtained ECs more frequently from physicians than from pharmacists.
INTERPRETATION: The policy change that granted pharmacists authority to provide ECs to women without a physician's prescription did not simply expand EC availability but was associated with an overall increase in EC use in the province.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15795408      PMCID: PMC554872          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.045019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  16 in total

1.  Timing of emergency contraception with levonorgestrel or the Yuzpe regimen. Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation.

Authors:  G Piaggio; H von Hertzen; D A Grimes; P F Van Look
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-02-27       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Estimating the effectiveness of emergency contraceptive pills.

Authors:  James Trussell; Charlotte Ellertson; Helena von Hertzen; Allison Bigrigg; Anne Webb; Margaret Evans; Sue Ferden; Clare Leadbetter
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Advanced provision of emergency contraception does not reduce abortion rates.

Authors:  Anna Glasier; Karen Fairhurst; Sally Wyke; Sue Ziebland; Peter Seaman; Jeremy Walker; Fatim Lakha
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  The effects of self-administering emergency contraception.

Authors:  A Glasier; D Baird
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-07-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Safety of emergency contraception.

Authors:  A Glasier
Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)       Date:  1998

6.  Emergency contraception: is it time to change method?

Authors:  A Webb
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-06

Review 7.  Improving women's access to emergency contraception: innovative information and service delivery strategies.

Authors:  K Blanchard
Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)       Date:  1998

8.  Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-08-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Evaluation of an emergency contraception advance provision service.

Authors:  Kelly Blanchard; Hilary Bungay; Ann Furedi; Lesley Sanders
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Are we making progress with emergency contraception? Recent findings on American adults and health professionals.

Authors:  S F Delbanco; F H Stewart; J D Koenig; M L Parker; T Hoff; M McIntosh
Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)       Date:  1998
View more
  17 in total

1.  Emergency contraception.

Authors:  Jane Farnham
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Emergency contraception.

Authors:  Lois Cantin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Prescription to over-the-counter deregulation in Canada: are we ready for it, or do we need to be?

Authors:  Larry D Lynd; Jeffrey Taylor; Roy Dobson; Donald J Willison
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Privacy issues and Plan B: the Canadian Pharmacists Association responds.

Authors:  George Murray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Awareness and perceptions of emergency contraception among retail pharmacists in Kuwait.

Authors:  Douglas E Ball; Najlaa Marafie; Eman Abahussain
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2006-07-04

6.  Emergency contraception moves behind the counter.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  ["Emergency contraception 2010"].

Authors:  Lorenzo Arribas Mir; María Jesús Ordóñez Ruiz; Belén Arribas Entrala
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 1.137

8.  Barriers and facilitators to family planning access in Canada.

Authors:  Jennifer Hulme; Sheila Dunn; Edith Guilbert; Judith Soon; Wendy Norman
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2015-02

9.  Synthetic progestins differentially promote or prevent 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced mammary tumors in sprague-dawley rats.

Authors:  Indira Benakanakere; Cynthia Besch-Williford; Candace E Carroll; Salman M Hyder
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-08-10

10.  The Cost of Unintended Pregnancies in Canada: Estimating Direct Cost, Role of Imperfect Adherence, and the Potential Impact of Increased Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives.

Authors:  Amanda Y Black; Edith Guilbert; Fareen Hassan; Ismini Chatziheofilou; Julia Lowin; Mark Jeddi; Anna Filonenko; James Trussell
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2015-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.