Literature DB >> 9647872

The effects of self-administering emergency contraception.

A Glasier1, D Baird.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency postcoital contraception prevents pregnancy, but it must be prescribed by a doctor and taken within 72 hours of intercourse. It has been proposed that emergency contraception be made available without a prescription. We undertook a study to learn how women might behave if given a supply of emergency contraceptive pills to keep at home.
METHODS: We assigned 553 women to be given a replaceable supply of hormonal emergency contraceptive pills to take home (the treatment group) and 530 women to use emergency contraception obtained by visiting a doctor (the control group). The frequency of use of emergency contraception, the use of other contraceptives, and the incidence of unwanted pregnancy were determined in both groups of women one year later.
RESULTS: The results for 549 women in the treatment group and 522 women in the control group were available for analysis. Three hundred seventy-nine of the women in the treatment group (69 percent) and 326 of the women in the control group (62 percent) contributed detailed information at follow-up. One hundred eighty of the women in the treatment group (47 percent) used emergency contraception at least once. Among those who returned the study questionnaire, 98 percent used emergency contraception correctly. There were no serious adverse effects. Eighty-seven women in the control group (27 percent) used emergency contraception at least once (P<0.001 for the comparison with the treatment group). The women in the treatment group were not more likely to use emergency contraception repeatedly. Their use of other methods of contraception was no different from that of the women in the control group. There were 18 unintended pregnancies in the treatment group and 25 in the control group (relative risk, 0.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.4 to 1.2).
CONCLUSIONS: Making emergency contraception more easily obtainable does no harm and may reduce the rate of unwanted pregnancies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparative Studies; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptive Agents, Postcoital; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Distributional Activities; Europe; Family Planning; Fertility; Fertility Control, Postcoital; Northern Europe; Organization And Administration; Population; Population Dynamics; Pregnancy, Unwanted; Prescriptions; Program Activities; Programs; Reproductive Behavior; Research Methodology; Research Report; Scotland; Studies; United Kingdom

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9647872     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199807023390101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  33 in total

1.  Preventing teenage pregnancies, supporting teenage mothers.

Authors:  C Mawer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-06-26

2.  Practice tips. Emergency contraception.

Authors:  M Greiver
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Emergency contraceptives over the counter. Allowing easy access is important.

Authors:  D A Grimes
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-03

Review 4.  [Emergency contraception].

Authors:  I Lete Lasa; M Arróniz; R Esquisábel
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 1.137

5.  How safe is emergency contraception?

Authors:  Abigail Norris Turner; Charlotte Ellertson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Trends in HIV, gonorrhoea, and syphilis. Screening for neurosyphilis is recommended.

Authors:  Claudio Solaro; Andrea De Maria; Alberto Primavera
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-08-31

7.  Turkish pharmacists' counseling practices and attitudes regarding emergency contraceptive pills.

Authors:  Sule Apikoglu-Rabus; Philip Martin Clark; Fikret V Izzettin
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2012-04-24

8.  Contraceptive compliance lags behind the science.

Authors:  Anna Glasier
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  Simplifying contraception requirements for iPLEDGE: A decision analysis.

Authors:  John S Barbieri; Andrea H Roe; Arash Mostaghimi
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 10.  Integrating clinical, community, and policy perspectives on human papillomavirus vaccination.

Authors:  María E Fernández; Jennifer D Allen; Ritesh Mistry; Jessica A Kahn
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 21.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.