PURPOSE: In order to obtain a respiratory signal for gated radiotherapy, diaphragm movement was monitored. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To obtain the diaphragm signal, an image brightness stabilizer for fluoroscopy of an X-ray simulator was used. The image brightness stabilizer output electric current in response to image brightness, which changed with diaphragm movement. The electric current was recorded as the diaphragm signal and compared with the abdominal wall signal, which was obtained by monitoring the height of the abdominal wall using a laser displacement sensor. RESULTS: A regular diaphragm signal was obtained in all of nine patients. At 70% expiration of the abdominal wall signal, the diaphragm signal ranged from 35% to 70% expiration (median, 55%). At 30% inspiration of the abdominal wall signal, the diaphragm signal ranged from 10% to 30% inspiration (median, 20%). CONCLUSION: A regular diaphragm signal could be conveniently obtained utilizing an image brightness stabilizer. The diaphragm signal tended to be delayed in comparison with the abdominal wall signal.
PURPOSE: In order to obtain a respiratory signal for gated radiotherapy, diaphragm movement was monitored. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To obtain the diaphragm signal, an image brightness stabilizer for fluoroscopy of an X-ray simulator was used. The image brightness stabilizer output electric current in response to image brightness, which changed with diaphragm movement. The electric current was recorded as the diaphragm signal and compared with the abdominal wall signal, which was obtained by monitoring the height of the abdominal wall using a laser displacement sensor. RESULTS: A regular diaphragm signal was obtained in all of nine patients. At 70% expiration of the abdominal wall signal, the diaphragm signal ranged from 35% to 70% expiration (median, 55%). At 30% inspiration of the abdominal wall signal, the diaphragm signal ranged from 10% to 30% inspiration (median, 20%). CONCLUSION: A regular diaphragm signal could be conveniently obtained utilizing an image brightness stabilizer. The diaphragm signal tended to be delayed in comparison with the abdominal wall signal.
Authors: Martin Lyngby Lassen; Thomas Rasmussen; Thomas E Christensen; Andreas Kjær; Philip Hasbak Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2016-09-07 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Kathleen T Malinowski; Jason R Pantarotto; Suresh Senan; Thomas J McAvoy; Warren D D'Souza Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Ahmad Bitarafan; Hossein Rajabi; Bernhard Gruy; Feridoon Rustgou; Ali Akbar Sharafi; Hasan Firoozabady; Nahid Yaghoobi; Hadi Malek; Christian Pirich; Werner Langesteger; Mohsen Beheshti Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2008 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.500