Literature DB >> 15785755

Gene expression profiling of colorectal adenomas and early invasive carcinomas by cDNA array analysis.

K Nosho1, H Yamamoto, Y Adachi, T Endo, Y Hinoda, K Imai.   

Abstract

It is generally accepted that most colorectal carcinomas arise in pre-existing adenomas. Morphologically, colorectal adenomas can be divided into two groups, protruded type and flat type. The aim of this study was to clarify relevant alterations of gene expression associated with the early stage of colorectal carcinogenesis. Using cDNA array, we analysed the expression profiles of 550 cancer-related genes in 36 colorectal adenomas (18 flat-type and 18 protruded-type adenomas) and 14 early invasive carcinomas. Among the 550 genes, we chose 32 genes the average expression levels of which were at least three-fold up- or downregulated in tumour tissues compared with levels in matched normal tissues. A total of 13 and 19 genes were identified as up- and downregulated genes in tumour tissues, respectively. Among the upregulated genes, the average expression levels of E1AF, bone morphogenic protein (BMP)-4, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-2, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1, Smad4, and nm23 in tumour tissues were over five times higher than those in matched normal tissues. Colorectal adenomas and early invasive carcinomas were divided into two major clusters by clustering analysis. Moreover, flat- and protruded-type adenomas were divided into two major clusters by clustering analysis. The expression profiles obtained by the cDNA array clearly indicate that colorectal adenomas and early invasive carcinomas have specific expression profiles. Likewise, the gene expression profiles of flat- and protruded-type adenomas are different. These results indicate that molecular classification of early colorectal tumours by a cDNA array is feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15785755      PMCID: PMC2361982          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Colorectal carcinoma is one of the most common human malignancies in the world. Although alternative pathways exist, it is generally accepted that most colorectal carcinomas arise in pre-existing adenomas (Jass ). Despite a large number of studies, little is known about molecular alterations associated with the heterogeneity of colorectal carcinomas. Morphologically, early colorectal tumors can be divided into two groups, protruded type and flat type. Recently, flat-type colorectal tumours have been reported not only in Japan (Sakashita ) but also in Western countries (Olschwang ). Previous studies showed that flat-type colorectal tumours tended to reach deeper layers earlier and to show higher rates of lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis than did protruded-type tumours (Kuramoto and Oohara, 1989; Mueller ). Moreover, it has been thought that some flat-type cancers correspond to de novo cancers, which contain no observable adenomatous component and may develop through a distinct genetic pathway (Yashiro ). Thus, it would be interesting to examine gene expression profiles of colorectal adenomas and early invasive colorectal carcinomas, because comparison of these two groups of tumours will provide information about genes that play an important role during progression from adenoma to carcinoma. DNA array technology enables measure of the mRNA expression levels of thousands of genes in a single assay. Mainly advanced cancer has been analysed in gene expression profiling-based studies on colorectal cancer (Alon ; Backert ; Hegde ; Kitahara ; Notterman ; Takemasa ; Agrawal ; Birkenkamp-Demtroder ; Lin ; Zou ; Frederiksen ; Muro ; Tureci ; Williams ; Bertucci ). Only a small number of adenoma and early invasive cancer tissues have been analysed in previous studies, and the issue of flat- and protruded-type adenoma tissues has not been directly addressed (Notterman ; Agrawal ; Lin ; Williams ). In this study, we therefore applied cDNA array technology to analyse the gene expression profiles of 36 colorectal adenomas (18 flat-type and 18 protruded-type adenomas) and 14 early invasive carcinomas. This is the first study showing molecular classification of early colorectal tumours by a cDNA array analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients and tissue samples

A total of 50 paired specimens of colorectal tumour and nontumour tissues were obtained by polypectomy or surgical treatment. These tumour samples consisted of 36 colorectal adenomas and 14 early invasive carcinomas (pT1 in the TNM classification of the Union International Contre Cancer). Normal epithelial tissue samples and tumour tissue samples were carefully macrodissected by expert pathologists. In case of early invasive carcinomas, tumour tissue samples were taken from the macroscopically visible deepest invading part of the tumour after surgical resection. Each tissue specimen was divided into two pieces after resection. For total RNA extraction, one sample was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen at the time of surgery and stored at −80°C until extraction. The other sample was processed for pathological examination using haematoxylin and eosin staining for the evaluation of the tumour cell content. Only specimens containing more than 80% tumour cells were used for analysis (Horiuchi ). The histopathological features of the carcinoma specimens were classified according to the TNM classification system. Locations of the colorectal tumours were divided into proximal colon (caecum and ascending and transverse colon) and distal colon (descending and sigmoid colon and rectum). Macroscopic types were divided into protruded type (height of tumour ⩾3 mm) and flat type (height of tumour <3 mm). It was difficult to divide early invasive carcinoma into protruded type or flat type because colorectal tumours become thick when they have invaded the submucosal layer. Therefore, macroscopic type was classified in only colorectal adenomas. The clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal tumours are shown in Table 1. Informed consent was obtained from each subject, and the institutional review committee approved this study.
Table 1

Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with colorectal tumour

   Adenoma (n=36)
Characteristics Early invasive carcinoma (n=14) Protruded type (n=18) Flat type (n=18)
Age (years, mean±s.d.)69.1±7.367.9±5.871.1±4.9
Size (mm, mean±s.d.)25.7±10.010.5±5.414.2±12.7
Gender
 Male81113
 Female675
Location
 Proximal9510
 Distal5138

cDNA array analysis

Total RNA was extracted from specimens using the acid guanidinum thiocyanatephenolchloroform extraction method and treated with DNase I. Biotin-labelled cDNA targets were made from 2.5 μg of total RNA using Gene Navigator cDNA amplification system (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan), including random 9-mer, biotin-16-dUTP, and ReverTraAceTM reverse transcriptase. Free biotin-16-dUTP in the reaction was removed by ethanol precipitation. Gene Navigator cDNA array filter (human cancer, Toyobo) consisted of 550 cancer-related genes and 11 housekeeping genes in duplicate. A complete list is available on the Internet (http://www.toyobo.co.jp). Hybridisation was performed overnight at 68°C in PerfectHybTM (Toyobo). Filters were washed three times in 2 × SSC/0.1% SDS at 68°C for 10 min each, followed by three washes in 0.1 × SSC/0.1% SDS at 68°C for 10 min each. Specific signals on the filters were detected by the chemiluminescence detection kit (Imaging highTM, Toyobo). CDP-Star was used as the chemiluminescent substrate. Quantitative assessment of the signals on the filters was performed by scanning on a Fluor-S MultiImager System (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA, USA) followed by image analysis using ImaGene software (BioDiscovery, Los Angeles, CA, USA). The data were analysed with normalisation to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) expression. The average of three experiments was calculated.

Statistical analysis

Expression of each target gene was assessed for associations with clinicopathological characteristics using Mann–Whitney U-test for average tumour expressions.

RESULTS

To clarify relevant alterations of gene expression associated with early colorectal carcinogenesis, we analysed the gene expression profiles of tumour tissues by a cDNA array (Yamamoto ). Gene Navigator cDNA array filter (human cancer, Toyobo) consisted of 550 cancer-related genes and 11 housekeeping genes in duplicate. Among the 550 genes the expression profiles of which were analysed, we chose 32 genes the average expression levels of which were at least three-fold up- or downregulated in 50 tumour tissues compared with levels in 50 matched normal tissues. Besides, since many colorectal tumours have been demonstrated to have a diversity of gene expression profiles, we examined the ratios of the selected 32 genes in all 50 tumour/normal pairs individually. The selected genes were classified as commonly changed if their ratio was three-fold up- or downregulated in more than one-third (15 of 50) of the patients. Among the selected 32 genes, all genes satisfied these criteria. A total of 13 genes (insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-2 bone morphogenic protein (BMP)-4, ECGF-1, E1AF, FAK, Rho GDIβ, nm23, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1, GSTP1, GST-II, Smad4, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and c-jun) and 19 genes (Egr-2, PMS1, Eph, gp130, Rho 8, Ras-GAP, p120, GAK, Erk1, Lamin β3, Cdc42, αN-catenin, MMP-15, Galectin-1, HLA-DQ, MUC-2, MDR1, Mucin3, and p21) were identified as up- and downregulated genes in tumour tissues, respectively. These genes were associated with transcription (Egr-2 and E1AF), DNA repair or protection (PMS1, GSTP1, and GST-II), cell signalling (Eph, gp130, Rho 8, Ras-GAP, p120, GAK, Rho GDIβ, Erk1, FAK, and Lamin β3), cell cycle (Cdc42), growth factor (IGF-2, BMP-4, and ECGF-1), tumour suppressor (nm23 and Smad4), oncogene (c-jun), cell adhesion (αN-catenin), extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes (MMP-15, TIMP-1, and Galectin-1), human leucocyte antigen (HLA-DQ), glycoprotein (MUC-2, MDR1, and Mucin3), CDK inhibitor (p21), and angiogenesis (iNOS). Among the 13 genes the average expression levels of which were at least three-fold upregulated in tumour tissues compared with levels in matched normal tissues, the average expression levels of E1AF, BMP-4, IGF-2, iNOS, TIMP-1, Smad4, and nm23 genes in tumour tissues were over five times higher than those in matched normal tissues (Table 2). Semiquantitative reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) analysis of these differentially expressed genes gave results consistent with those by a cDNA array analysis (Figure 1).
Table 2

Average expression levels of E1AF, BMP4, IGF-2, iNOS, TIMP-1, Smad4, and nm23 genes in tumour tissues were over five times higher than those in the matched normal tissues

Gene name Function T average/N average
E1AFTranscription8.11
BMP4Growth factor7.64
IGF-2Growth factor6.80
iNOSAngiogenesis6.55
TIMP-1Inhibitor of MMPs6.39
Smad4Tumour suppressor6.03
nm23Tumour suppressor5.33

T average=average expression levels in tumour tissues; N average,=average expression levels in matched normal tissues. The average of three experiments is shown.

Figure 1

Reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction analysis of mRNA expression for IGF-2, E1AF, and iNOS in colorectal tumour tissues. T and N, matched samples from tumour and nontumour tissue, respectively. Cases 1–4 are colorectal adenomas and cases 5–8 are colorectal carcinomas (pT1).

Colorectal adenomas (n=36) and early invasive carcinomas (n=14) were divided into two major clusters by clustering analysis (Figure 2). The average expression levels of 10 (IGF-2, E1AF, iNOS, Rho GDIβ, GSTP1, c-jun, ECGF1, nm23, Smad4, and TIMP-1) of the 32 genes were significantly higher in the early invasive carcinoma group than in the adenoma group. On the other hand, the average expression levels of 12 (Eph, gp130, GST-II, Rho 8, MUC-2, Ras-GAP, p120, MDR1, αN-catenin, Egr-2, PMS1, and GAK) of the 32 genes were significantly lower in the early invasive carcinoma group than in the adenoma group (Table 3).
Figure 2

A two-dimensional hierarchical clustering of 32 genes across 50 colorectal tumours. The colour in each well represents relative expression of each gene (vertical axis) in each paired sample (horizontal axis); red, increased in tumour tissues; green, decreased in the tumour tissues. In the sample axis, early invasive carcinomas and adenomas were separated into two different trunks. In the gene axis, 32 genes were clustered in different branches according to their similarity; the shorter the branches, the greater the similarity. In adenomas, subclusters of flat type and protruded type were selected for further analysis (see Figure 3).

Table 3

Genes the expression levels of which differed significantly in the early invasive carcinoma group and the adenoma group (Mann–Whitney U-test)

Gene name Accession no. Gene function P-value
EphM18391Cell signalling0.0342CA<AD
Gp130M57230Cell signalling0.0122CA<AD
GST-IIU77604DNA repair or protection0.0108CA<AD
Rho 8X95282Cell signalling0.0069CA<AD
MUC-2M74027Glycoprotein0.0046CA<AD
Ras-GAPAF051311Cell signalling0.0035CA<AD
P120AF062324Cell signalling0.0029CA<AD
MDR1AF016535Glycoprotein0.0019CA<AD
αN-cateninM94151Cell adhesion0.0014CA<AD
Egr-2X53700Transcription0.0011CA<AD
PMS1U13695DNA repair or protection0.0002CA<AD
GAKD88435Cell signalling0.0001CA<AD
IGF-2M29645Growth factor0.0491CA>AD
E1AFD12765Transcription0.0187CA>AD
iNOSAB022318Angiogenesis0.0084CA>AD
Rho GDIβL20688Cell signalling0.0002CA>AD
GSTP1X06547DNA repair or protection<0.0001CA>AD
c-junJ04111Oncogene<0.0001CA>AD
ECGF1M63193Growth factor<0.0001CA>AD
nm23X17620Tumour suppressor<0.0001CA>AD
Smad4U44378Tumour suppressor<0.0001CA>AD
TIMP1X03124Extracellular matrix-Degrading enzymes<0.0001CA>AD
BMP-4D30751Growth factor0.7494 
Cdc42M57298Cell cycle0.65 
Erk1X60188Cell signalling0.2101 
FAKL13616Cell signalling0.0878 
Galectin-1J04456Extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes0.136 
HLA-DQU77589Human leucocyte antigen0.8289 
Laminin β-3D37766Cell signalling0.7134 
MMP-15Z48482Extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes0.8289 
Mucin 3AF143371Glycoprotein0.2897 
P21U03106CDK inhibitor0.1734 

CA=early invasive carcinoma group; AD=adenoma group.

Flat-type (n=18) and protruded-type (n=18) adenomas were divided into two major clusters by clustering analysis (Figure 3). The average expression levels of 16 (PMS1, nm23, p21, FAK, Smad4, c-jun, ECGF-1, Erk1, GAK, GSTP1, IGF-2, Laminin β-3, MMP-15, Mucin3, Rho GDIβ, and TIMP-1) of the 32 genes were significantly higher in the flat-type group than in the protruded-type group, while the average expression levels of 11 (HLA-DQ, Cdc42, Egr-2, Eph, Galectin-1, gp130, GST-II, MDR1, p120, Ras-GAP, and Rho 8) of the 32 genes were significantly lower in the flat-type group than in the protruded-type group (Table 4).
Figure 3

A two-dimensional hierarchical clustering of 32 genes across 36 colorectal adenomas. The colour in each well represents relative expression of each gene (vertical axis) in each paired sample (horizontal axis); red, increased in adenoma tissues; green, decreased in adenoma tissues. In the sample axis, flat- and protruded-type adenomas were separated into two different trunks.

Table 4

Genes the expression levels of which differed significantly in the flat-type adenoma group and the protruded-type adenoma group (Mann–Whitney U-test)

Gene name Accession no. Gene function P-value
PMS1U13695DNA repair or protection0.0136P<F
nm23X17620Tumour suppressor0.0004P<F
p21U03106CDK inhibitor0.001P<F
FAKL13616Cell signalling0.0017P<F
Smad4U44378Tumour suppressor0.0429P<F
c-junJ04111Oncogene<0.0001P<F
ECGF1M63193Growth factor<0.0001P<F
Erk1X60188Cell signalling<0.0001P<F
GAKD88435Cell signalling<0.0001P<F
GSTP1X06547DNA repair or protection<0.0001P<F
IGF-2M29645Growth factor<0.0001P<F
Laminin β-3D37766Cell signalling<0.0001P<F
MMP-15Z48482Extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes<0.0001P<F
Mucin 3AF143371Glycoprotein<0.0001P<F
Rho GDIβL20688Cell signalling<0.0001P<F
TIMP1X03124Extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes<0.0001P<F
HLA-DQU77589Human leucocyte antigen0.0003P>F
Cdc42M57298Cell cycle<0.0001P>F
Egr-2X53700Transcription<0.0001P>F
EphM18391Cell signalling<0.0001P>F
Galectin-1J04456Extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes<0.0001P>F
Gp130M57230Cell signalling<0.0001P>F
GST-IIU77604DNA repair or protection<0.0001P>F
MDR1AF016535Glycoprotein<0.0001P>F
p120AF062324Cell signalling<0.0001P>F
Ras-GAPAF051311Cell signalling<0.0001P>F
Rho 8X95282Cell signalling<0.0001P>F
E1AFD12765Transcription0.1488 
iNOSAB022318Angiogenesis0.1639 
BMP-4D30751Growth factor0.1966 
MUC-2M74027Glycoprotein0.4107 
αN-cateninM94151Cell adhesion0.5478 

F=flat-type adenoma group; P=protruded-type adenoma group.

Among the 32 genes, the average expression levels of eight genes (Rho GDIβ, c-jun, iNOS, TIMP-1, GSTP1, ECGF1, nm23, and Smad4) and four genes (MUC-2, αN-catenin, PMS1, and GAK) were significantly lower and higher, respectively, in both the flat- and protruded-type adenoma groups than in the early invasive carcinoma group. The average expression levels of two genes (Cdc42 and Galectin-1) and four genes (p21, Erk1, Mucin 3, and Laminin β-3) were significantly lower and higher, respectively, in the flat-type adenoma group than those in the early invasive carcinoma group (Table 5). On the other hand, the average expression levels of seven genes (Erk1, Mucin 3, Laminin β-3, IGF-2, FAK, MMP-15, and E1AF) and nine genes (Cdc42, Eph, gp130, GST-II, Rho 8, Ras-GAP, p120, MDR1, and Egr-2) were significantly lower and higher, respectively, in the protruded-type adenoma group than in the early invasive carcinoma group (Table 5).
Table 5

Genes the expression levels of which differed significantly in the early invasive carcinoma group and the protruded-type (28 genes) or flat-type (18 genes) adenoma group (Mann-Whitney U-test)

Gene name Accession no. P-value P-value
BMP-4D307510.6128 0.2968 
Cdc42M572980.001CA<AD (P)0.0122CA>AD (F)
c-junJ04111<0.0001CA>AD (P)0.0135CA>AD (F)
E1AFD127650.0086CA>AD (P)0.13 
ECGF1M63193<0.0001CA>AD (P)0.0002CA>AD (F)
Egr-2X53700<0.0001CA<AD (P)0.3423 
EphM183910.0005CA<AD (P)0.7903 
Erk1X60188<0.0001CA>AD (P)0.0276CA<AD (F)
FAKL136160.0304CA>AD (P)0.4033 
GAKD884350.0227CA<AD (P)<0.0001CA<AD (F)
Galectin-1J044560.704 0.0027CA>AD (F)
Gp130M57230<0.0001CA<AD (P)0.9093 
GST-IIU77604<0.0001CA<AD (P)0.8197 
GSTP1X06547<0.0001CA>AD (P)0.0006CA>AD (F)
HLA-DQU775890.1489 0.0682 
IGF-2M296450.0034CA>AD (P)0.5937 
iNOSAB0223180.0402CA>AD (P)0.0098CA>AD (F)
Laminin β-3D377660.0016CA>AD (P)0.0001CA<AD (F)
MDR1AF016535<0.0001CA<AD (P)0.4941 
MMP-15Z484820.025CA>AD (P)0.0627 
MUC-2M740270.0044CA<AD (P)0.0334CA<AD (F)
Mucin 3AF143371<0.0001CA>AD (P)0.0227CA<AD (F)
nm23X17620<0.0001CA>AD (P)0.0001CA>AD (F)
p120AF062324<0.0001CA<AD (P)0.4941 
p21U031060.7324 0.0402CA<AD (F)
PMS1U136950.0044CA<AD (P)0.0002CA<AD (F)
Ras-GAPAF051311<0.0001CA<AD (P)0.7324 
Rho 8X95282<0.0001CA<AD (P)0.8494 
Rho GDIβL20688<0.0001CA>AD (P)0.0304CA>AD (F)
Smad4U44378<0.0001CA>AD (P)<0.0001CA>AD (F)
TIMP1X03124<0.0001CA>AD (P)0.0024CA>AD (F)
αN-cateninM941510.0014CA<AD (P)0.0151CA<AD (F)

CA=early invasive carcinoma group; AD (P)=protruded-type adenoma group; AD (F)=flat-type adenoma group.

DISCUSSION

Using a cDNA array, we analysed the gene expression profiles of 36 colorectal adenoma and 14 early invasive carcinoma tissues to clarify characteristic changes associated with the early stage of colorectal carcinogenesis. The reason why we chose early invasive carcinoma is that it represents the early stage of colorectal carcinoma. Among the 550 genes the expression profiles of which were analysed, we chose 32 genes the average expression levels of which were at least three-fold up- or downregulated in 50 tumour tissues compared with levels in 50 matched normal tissues. Among the 13 upregulated genes, the expression levels of E1AF, BMP-4, IGF-2, iNOS, TIMP-1, Smad4, and nm23 genes were over five-times higher than those in matched normal tissues. E1AF (human PEA3/ETV4) is an ets family transcriptional factor. We recently reported that E1AF plays a key role in the progression of colorectal carcinoma (Horiuchi ). Thus, our results of cDNA array analysis extend roles of E1AF in the late stage to early stage of colorectal carcinogenesis. BMP-4 is a member of the TGF-β superfamily of growth factors. It has been reported that BMP-4 is overexpressed and secreted by human colon cancer cells with mutant APC genes (Kim ). Our results suggest that BMP-4 overexpression plays an important role in the early stage of colorectal carcinogenesis. iNOS has been reported to play a crucial role in cancer development by promoting angiogenesis (Jenkins ). Our results are consistent with those of previous studies showing an important role of iNOS in the early stage of colorectal carcinogenesis (Xu ). Interestingly, nitric oxide (NO), generated by iNOS, reportedly augments the synergistic interaction between E1AF and its transcription coactivator CBP/p300, resulting in the facilitation of induction of tumour-related genes, such as COX-2 (Liu ). Several lines of evidence suggest that IGF-2 plays an important role in the progression of colorectal tumours (Lambert ). Moreover, expression of IGF-2 protein has been reported to be associated with advanced tumour stage and poor survival (Kawamoto ; Peters ). It has also been suggested that IGF-2 plays a role in the development of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer (Kawamoto ). Thus, our results extend roles of IGF-2 in the late stage to early stage of colorectal carcinogenesis. Among the four known tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), TIMP-1 has functions apart from its protease inhibitory action. Several investigators have reported that TIMP-1 has growth-promoting properties and might also stimulate tumour growth by inhibiting apoptosis (Holten-Andersen ). Overexpression of TIMP-1 has been reported in colorectal cancer tissues (Murashige ). Holten-Andersen recently reported that TIMP-1 mRNA was detected in all of 24 cases of colorectal cancer tissues by in situ hybridisation, but it was detected in only two of seven adenoma tissues. In the current study, we also found that the average expression levels of TIMP-1 were significantly higher in the early invasive carcinoma group than in the adenoma group. Besides, levels of TIMP-1 in blood were significantly elevated in colorectal cancer patients compared to healthy donors, and high plasma TIMP-1 levels were associated with short survival of colorectal cancer patients (Holten-Andersen ). Therefore, TIMP-1 appears to be a novel marker for detection of early colorectal cancer and for prognostic stratification of colorectal cancer patients. Smad4 is an intracellular transmitter of TGF-β signals and its tumour suppressor function is presumed to reside in its capacity to mediate TGF-β-induced growth inhibition. However, there is accumulating evidence that this hypothesis may be too simple (Muller ). Although functional inactivation of Smad4 in colorectal cancer frequently occurs at late stages when tumours acquire invasive and metastatic capabilities, the roles of TGF-β signals in carcinogenesis are complex and also comprise tumour-promoting functions in colorectal carcinogenesis (Muller ; Reinacher-Schick ). Nevertheless, the reason for the overexpression of Smad4 in early colorectal tumour tissues remains unknown. It may be induced to inhibit tumour growth by some compensatory mechanisms. Further analysis is needed to clarify this issue. The nm23 gene was first identified as a gene the expression level of which was reduced in highly metastatic rodent tumours relative to poorly metastatic tumour cells (Steeg ). The transfection of nm23 cDNA into various cancer cell lines resulted in suppression of the metastatic potential of motility, invasion, or colonisation (Suzuki ). However, Bertucci recently reported over- and downexpression of nm23 in colorectal cancer tissues and in those with poor prognosis, respectively. The reason why nm23 gene was highly expressed in tumour tissues in the current study may be due to the fact that all tumour samples consisted of early colorectal tumours without metastasis. Further analysis is needed to clarify this issue. We identified 22 genes the expression levels of which differed significantly in colorectal adenomas and early invasive carcinomas. Colorectal adenomas and early invasive carcinomas were divided into two major clusters by clustering analysis. This result is consistent with that of a recent study showing that nine colorectal adenomas were separated from 11 differentiated colorectal carcinomas by using oligonucleotide arrays (Lin ). The expression profiles obtained by our cDNA array demonstrated that colorectal adenomas and early invasive carcinomas have specific expression profiles. Among the seven upregulated genes the expression levels of which were over five times higher than those in the matched normal tissues, the expression levels of IGF-2, E1AF, iNOS, nm23, Smad4, and TIMP-1 genes were significantly higher in the early invasive carcinoma group than in the adenoma group. These results suggest that these genes play an important role in the progression from adenoma to carcinoma. On the other hand, GAK was the most downregulated gene in the early invasive carcinoma group relative to the adenoma group. GAK is a serine/threonine kinase that shows high homology outside its kinase domain with auxilin. Like auxilin, GAK has been shown to be a cofactor for uncoating clathrin vesicles in vitro. Zhang reported that downregulation of GAK by small hairpin RNA increased the levels of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor expression and tyrosine kinase activity, resulting in a large increase in the levels of activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 5 and Akt. Moreover, downregulation of GAK has been reported to result in outgrowth of monkey kidney CV1P cells in soft agar, raising the possibility that loss of GAK function may promote tumorigenesis. Thus, our results suggest that downregulation of GAK plays an important role in the progression from colorectal adenoma to carcinoma. The adenomacarcinoma sequence (ACS) is widely accepted as a pathogenesis of colorectal carcinoma. A multistep genetic model for colorectal carcinogenesis based on the ACS has been proposed (Vogelstein ). In the ACS sequence, mutations in the K-ras gene and various tumour suppressor genes, such as APC and p53, are known to accumulate during the progression from normal to malignant tissue. Although coexistence of all three mutations has been reported to be a rare occurrence (Smith ), the majority of sporadic colorectal carcinomas are still thought to develop and progress through this pathway. It has been thought that de novo cancers develop from normal colonic mucosa directly. However, critical genetic abnormality is not known. Most protruded-type colorectal cancers have adenomatous elements in the periphery when found at an early stage, suggesting that these cancers have arisen from pre-existing adenomas. On the other hand, adenomatous components are not detectable microscopically in some flat-type cancers, suggesting that flat-type cancers correspond to de novo cancer (Yashiro ). The reason why we could not detect any changes in the expression of APC, p53, and K-ras genes may be due to the fact that mutations of these genes do not necessarily result in alterations of mRNA expression levels. In the current study, flat- and protruded-type adenomas were divided into two major clusters by clustering analysis. We identified 27 genes the expression levels of which differed significantly in flat- and protruded-type adenomas. The expression levels of 16 genes (PMS1, nm23, p21, FAK, Smad4, c-jun, ECGF-1, Erk1, GAK, GSTP1, IGF-2, Laminin β-3, MMP-15, Mucin3, Rho GDIβ, and TIMP-1) were significantly higher in the flat-type group than in the protruded-type group. On the other hand, the expression levels of 11 genes (HLA-DQ, Cdc42, Egr-2, Eph, Galectin-1, gp130, GST-II, MDR1, p120, Ras-GAP, and Rho 8) were significantly lower in the flat-type group than in the protruded-type group. Among the 18 genes the expression levels of which were significantly different in the early invasive carcinoma group and the flat-type adenoma group, the expression levels of eight genes (p21, MUC-2, Erk1, Mucin 3, αN-catenin, PMS1, Lamin β3, and GAK) and 10 genes (Rho GDIβ, c-jun, Cdc42, iNOS, Galectin-1, TIMP-1, GSTP1, ECGF1, nm23, and Smad4) were significantly higher and lower, respectively, in the flat-type adenoma group than in the early invasive cancer group. On the other hand, among the 28 genes the expression levels of which were significantly different in the early invasive carcinoma group and the protruded-type adenoma group, the expression levels of 13 genes (GAK, MUC-2, PMS1, αN-catenin, Cdc42, Eph, gp130, GST-II, Rho 8, Ras-GAP, p120, MDR1, and Egr-2) and 15 genes (iNOS, FAK, MMP-15, E1AF, IGF-2, Laminin β3, Smad4, TIMP1, nm23, Rho GDIβ, GSTP1, c-jun, ECGF1, Erk1, and Mucin 3) were significantly higher and lower, respectively, in the protruded-type adenoma group than in the early invasive cancer group. These results suggest that flat- and protruded-type adenomas have specific expression profiles and that genes that play a crucial role in the progression from each type of adenoma to carcinoma are different. In conclusion, the expression profiles obtained by the cDNA array clearly indicate that colorectal adenomas and early invasive carcinomas have specific expression profiles. Likewise, the gene expression profiles of flat- and protruded-type adenomas are different. These results indicate that molecular classification of early colorectal tumours by a cDNA array is feasible.
  41 in total

1.  IGF-1R, IGF-1 and IGF-2 expression as potential prognostic and predictive markers in colorectal-cancer.

Authors:  Gerrit Peters; Silvia Gongoll; Cord Langner; Michael Mengel; Pompiliu Piso; Jürgen Klempnauer; Josef Rüschoff; Hans Kreipe; Reinhard von Wasielewski
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2003-07-05       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Analysis of gene expression in human colorectal cancer tissues by cDNA array.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Arisa Imsumran; Hiroshi Fukushima; Yasushi Adachi; Yongfen Min; Shouhei Iku; Shina Horiuchi; Mio Yoshida; Kazuko Shimada; Shigeru Sasaki; Fumio Itoh; Takao Endo; Kohzoh Imai
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  Smad4 induces the tumor suppressor E-cadherin and P-cadherin in colon carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Nicole Müller; Anke Reinacher-Schick; Stephan Baldus; Jolanda van Hengel; Geert Berx; Anke Baar; Frans van Roy; Wolff Schmiegel; Irmgard Schwarte-Waldhoff
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2002-09-05       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Gene expression profiling of colon cancer by DNA microarrays and correlation with histoclinical parameters.

Authors:  François Bertucci; Sébastien Salas; Séverine Eysteries; Valéry Nasser; Pascal Finetti; Christophe Ginestier; Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret; Béatrice Loriod; Loïc Bachelart; Jérôme Montfort; Geneviève Victorero; Frédéric Viret; Vincent Ollendorff; Vincent Fert; Marc Giovaninni; Jean-Robert Delpero; Catherine Nguyen; Patrice Viens; Geneviève Monges; Daniel Birnbaum; Rémi Houlgatte
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Association of ets-related transcriptional factor E1AF expression with tumour progression and overexpression of MMP-1 and matrilysin in human colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shina Horiuchi; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Yongfen Min; Yasushi Adachi; Fumio Itoh; Kohzoh Imai
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.996

6.  nm23-H1 reduces in vitro cell migration and the liver metastatic potential of colon cancer cells by regulating myosin light chain phosphorylation.

Authors:  Eiji Suzuki; Tetsuya Ota; Kazunori Tsukuda; Atsushi Okita; Kinya Matsuoka; Masakazu Murakami; Hiroyoshi Doihara; Nobuyoshi Shimizu
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-01-10       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Classification of Dukes' B and C colorectal cancers using expression arrays.

Authors:  Casper Møller Frederiksen; Steen Knudsen; Søren Laurberg; Torben F Ørntoft
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Identification and validation of genes involved in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer using cDNA microarrays and RNA interference.

Authors:  Noelle Sevilir Williams; Richard B Gaynor; Shane Scoggin; Udit Verma; Tunc Gokaslan; Clifford Simmang; Jason Fleming; Denise Tavana; Eugene Frenkel; Carlos Becerra
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Computational dissection of tissue contamination for identification of colon cancer-specific expression profiles.

Authors:  Ozlem Türeci; Jiayi Ding; Holly Hilton; Hongjin Bian; Hitomi Ohkawa; Michael Braxenthaler; Gerhard Seitz; Laura Raddrizzani; Helmut Friess; Markus Buchler; Ugur Sahin; Juergen Hammer
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Role of inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in aberrant crypt foci-adenoma-carcinoma sequence.

Authors:  Mei-Hua Xu; Chang-Sheng Deng; You-Qing Zhu; Jun Lin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  11 in total

1.  The ETS gene ETV4 is required for anchorage-independent growth and a cell proliferation gene expression program in PC3 prostate cells.

Authors:  Peter C Hollenhorst; Litty Paul; Mary W Ferris; Barbara J Graves
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2011-01-01

Review 2.  Recent advancement in understanding colitis-associated tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Daren Low; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Emiko Mizoguchi
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.325

3.  Gene expression profiling reveals a massive, aneuploidy-dependent transcriptional deregulation and distinct differences between lymph node-negative and lymph node-positive colon carcinomas.

Authors:  Marian Grade; Patrick Hörmann; Sandra Becker; Amanda B Hummon; Danny Wangsa; Sudhir Varma; Richard Simon; Torsten Liersch; Heinz Becker; Michael J Difilippantonio; B Michael Ghadimi; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  A candidate targeting molecule of insulin-like growth factor-I receptor for gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  Yasushi Adachi; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Hirokazu Ohashi; Takao Endo; David-P Carbone; Kohzoh Imai; Yasuhisa Shinomura
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Overexpression of CK20, MAP3K8 and EIF5A correlates with poor prognosis in early-onset colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Berrin Tunca; Gulcin Tezcan; Gulsah Cecener; Unal Egeli; Abdullah Zorluoglu; Tuncay Yilmazlar; Secil Ak; Omer Yerci; Ersin Ozturk; Gorkem Umut; Turkkan Evrensel
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Polymorphisms in bone morphogenetic protein 3 and the risk of papillary thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Young Ock Kim; Il Ki Hong; Young Gyu Eun; Seong-Su Nah; Soojeong Lee; Su-Hak Heo; Hyung-Kee Kim; Ho-Yeon Song; Hak-Jae Kim
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Head and neck squamous cancer stromal fibroblasts produce growth factors influencing phenotype of normal human keratinocytes.

Authors:  Hynek Strnad; Lukás Lacina; Michal Kolár; Zdenek Cada; Cestmír Vlcek; Barbora Dvoránková; Jan Betka; Jan Plzák; Martin Chovanec; Jana Sáchová; Jaroslav Valach; Markéta Urbanová; Karel Smetana
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 4.304

8.  Effects of ginger supplementation on cell-cycle biomarkers in the normal-appearing colonic mucosa of patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer: results from a pilot, randomized, and controlled trial.

Authors:  Jessica Citronberg; Roberd Bostick; Thomas Ahearn; D Kim Turgeon; Mack T Ruffin; Zora Djuric; Ananda Sen; Dean E Brenner; Suzanna M Zick
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2013-01-09

9.  A survey of tandem repeat instabilities and associated gene expression changes in 35 colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Tugce Bilgin Sonay; Malamati Koletou; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Comparative gene expression profiling of normal and human colorectal adenomatous tissues.

Authors:  Gongliang DU; Xuehong Fang; Wei Dai; Ruipeng Zhang; Ruiting Liu; Xingbo Dang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.