| Literature DB >> 15785739 |
K Mimura1, K Kono, M Hanawa, F Mitsui, H Sugai, N Miyagawa, A Ooi, H Fujii.
Abstract
The utilisation of antitumour T cells induced by cancer vaccination with HER-2 peptides or antibodies (Herceptin) against HER-2, as immunotherapy for oesophageal cancer, is a novel and attractive approach. It is important to clarify the frequencies of HER-2 expression and gene amplification in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and to evaluate the relationship between HER-2 status and HLA haplotype, since the candidates for HER-2 peptide-based vaccination are restricted to a certain HLA haplotype. We determined the frequency of HER-2 expression using the HercepTest for immunohistochemistry and HER-2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) assay in oesophageal SCC (n=66). HER-2-positive tumours (1+/2+/3+) analysed by a HercepTest were observed in 30.3% of all the patients and HER-2 gene amplification evaluated by FISH was observed in 11.0% of all the patients, in which all HercepTest (3+) tumours were found to have gene amplification and three of six moderately positive (2+) tumours showed gene amplification. Furthermore, HER-2-positive cells were present more diffusely and were larger within each tumour in the patients who were HercepTest 3+ than those who were HercepTest 1+. Moreover, the survival rate in HER-2-positive group was significantly worse than that in HER-2-negative group. Also, the survival rate in the patients with HER-2 gene amplification was significantly worse than that without HER-2 gene amplification. In addition, oesophageal SCC patients with both HLA-A24-positive and HER-2-positive tumours (1+/2+/3+) accounted for 26% of these cases, and both HLA-A2- and HER-2-positive tumours accounted for 18% of them.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15785739 PMCID: PMC2361961 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602499
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Clinical features of the patients (n=66)
|
| |
| Mean | 65.3 |
| Range | 45–81 |
|
| |
| Male | 62 |
| Female | 4 |
| Primary tumour | |
| pTis | 2 |
| pT1a | 8 |
| pT1b | 18 |
| pT2 | 5 |
| pT3 | 32 |
|
| |
| Negative | 29 |
| Positive | 37 |
|
| |
| Well differentiated | 15 |
| Moderate differentiated | 35 |
| Poorly differentiated | 14 |
|
| |
| 0 | 9 |
| I | 5 |
| II | 25 |
| III | 19 |
| Iva | 6 |
| Ivb | 1 |
LNM=lymph node metastasis; SCC=squamous cell carcinoma.
The grade of tumour and stages were defined according to the UICC (TMN) classification.
Figure 1Representative immunostaining of HER-2-positive cells. (A) 1+ staining cases, (B) 2+ staining cases and (C) 3+ staining cases. Original magnification × 200.
Figure 2Heterogeneity in the pattern of HER-2 immunostaining. The staining pattern was categorised as spot type and diffuse type. (A) Spot type and (B) diffuse type. Original magnification × 100.
Frequencies of HER-2-positive patients detected by IHC in oesophageal SCC
|
| |
|---|---|
|
| |
| 3+ | 3 (4.5%) |
| 2+ | 6 (9.1%) |
| 1+ | 1 1 (16.7%) |
IHC=immunohistochemistry; SCC=squamous cell carcinoma.
Patients with HER-2-positive oesophageal SCC detected by IHC and their FISH analyses
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 | 73 | M | III | Mod | 3+ | Diffuse | 3+ | Cluster |
| 2 | 54 | M | III | Por | 3+ | Diffuse | 3+ | Cluster |
| 3 | 62 | M | IVa | Mod | 3+ | Diffuse | 3+ | Cluster |
| 4 | 62 | M | IVa | Mod | 2+ | Spot | 0 | Cluster |
| 5 | 59 | M | III | Well | 2+ | Diffuse | 0 | Cluster |
| 6 | 57 | M | III | Mod | 2+ | Spot | 2+ | Polysomy |
| 7 | 55 | M | II | Por | 2+ | Diffuse | 2+ | No amplification |
| 8 | 69 | M | II | Well | 2+ | Spot | No | No amplification |
| 9 | 76 | M | I | Well | 2+ | Spot | No | Cluster |
| 10 | 56 | M | II | Mod | 1+ | Spot | 0 | Polysomy |
| 11 | 74 | M | III | Well | 1+ | Diffuse | 0 | Polysomy |
| 12 | 60 | M | III | Mod | 1+ | Spot | 0 | No amplification |
| 13 | 60 | M | III | Por | 1+ | Diffuse | 0 | No amplification |
| 14 | 64 | M | III | Mod | 1+ | Diffuse | 0 | No amplification |
| 15 | 67 | M | III | Mod | 1+ | Diffuse | 0 | No amplification |
| 16 | 71 | M | III | Mod | 1+ | Spot | 0 | No amplification |
| 17 | 47 | F | II | Por | 1+ | Diffuse | 1+ | No amplification |
| 18 | 74 | M | 0 | Por | 1+ | Spot | No | Cluster |
| 19 | 70 | M | II | Mod | 1+ | Diffuse | No | No amplification |
| 20 | 80 | M | II | Por | 1+ | Spot | No | No amplification |
SCC=squamous cell carcinoma; IHC=immunohistochemistry; FISH=fluorescence in situ hybridisation; LN=lymph node; No=no lymph node metastasis.
Stages were defined according to the TNM classification.
Well=well-differentiated SCC; mod=moderately differentiated SCC; por=poorly differentiated SCC.
IHC score was defined by the staining intensity of tumour cells (0, 1+, 2+, 3+).
Figure 3Representative FISH analysis of HER-2 gene amplification (cluster formation). The serial sections in the representative case were analysed by IHC (A) (3+ staining cases, × 400) and FISH analysis (× 400 in (B)).
Correlation between IHC scores and the rate of HER-2-positive tumour cells in each tumour
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
| 3+ ( | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| 2+ ( | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| 1+ ( | 8 | 1 | 2 |
IHC=immunohistochemistry.
Frequencies of the HLA-A haplotype related to HER-2 expression in oesophageal SCC (n=50)
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
| ||
| Positive ( | 9 (18%) | 17 (34%) |
| Negative ( | 9 (18%) | 15 (30%) NS |
|
| ||
| Positive ( | 7 (14%) | 7 (14%) |
| Negative ( | 11 (22%) | 25 (50%) NS |
|
| ||
| Positive ( | 13 (26%) | 19 (38%) |
| Negative ( | 5 (10%) | 13 (26%) NS |
SCC=squamous cell carcinoma; HLA=human leucocyte antigen.
Percentage indicates the number of patients out of all patients (n=50).
Not significant by χ2 test.
Figure 4(A) Survival curves of HER-2-negative and HER-2-positive (1+/2+/3+) groups. (B) Survival curves of HER-2-negative and HER-2 (2+/3+) groups.
Figure 5Survival curves of HER-2 gene amplification-negative and HER-2 gene amplification-positive groups.
Significance of prognostic factors in univariate and multivariate survival analysis for patients with oesophageal SCC
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||
| Negative | 1.0 | — | — | 1.0 | — | — |
| Positive | 4.05 | 1.31–12.53 | 0.015 | 2.94 | 0.78–11.09 | 0.111 |
|
| ||||||
| Negative | 1.00 | — | — | 1.0 | — | — |
| Positive | 2.06 | 0.93–4.57 | 0.074 | 0.92 | 0.35–2.41 | 0.861 |
|
| ||||||
| pTis-pT1b | 1.0 | — | — | 1.0 | — | — |
| pT2 | 5.85 | 1.56–21.91 | 0.009 | 5.00 | 1.06–23.52 | 0.042 |
| pT3 | 5.28 | 1.91–14.55 | 0.001 | 3.01 | 0.76–11.95 | 0.117 |
|
| ||||||
| Negative | 1.0 | — | — | 1.0 | — | — |
| Positive | 3.13 | 1.32–7.39 | 0.009 | 1.56 | 0.25–9.68 | 0.636 |
|
| ||||||
| 0–II | 1.0 | — | — | 1.0 | — | — |
| III–IV | 5.21 | 2.33–11.64 | <0.0001 | 2.09 | 0.30–14.53 | 0.458 |
SCC=squamous cell carcinoma; CI=confidence interval; FISH=fluorescence in situ hybridisation; LNM=lymph node metastasis.
The grade of tumour and stages were defined according to the UICC (TMN) classification.