Literature DB >> 1578210

A comparison of three rapid chlamydial tests in pregnant and nonpregnant women.

D G Ferris1, W H Martin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the performance characteristics of three rapid immunoassay tests to detect Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis.
METHODS: Endocervical samples from 506 women were evaluated using the three rapid immunoassay tests and the results were compared with those obtained by an endocervical chlamydial culture.
RESULTS: The prevalence of C trachomatis cervicitis was 9.3%. Overall sensitivity and specificity of the Abbott TestPack Chlamydia test were 66.0% and 99.8%, respectively, of the Kodak Surecell Chlamydia test were 85.1% and 99.3%, respectively, and of the Unipath Clearview Chlamydia test were 85.1% and 98.5%, respectively. Pregnancy did not affect test specificity, but did influence sensitivity. The tests ranged from 5% to 22% less sensitive in nonpregnant women.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the investigation establish that the Clearview and Surecell chlamydial immunoassay tests performed well, particularly for pregnant women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1578210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of Clearview Chlamydia.

Authors:  I Davidson; L Roberts
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Impact of reference standard sensitivity on accuracy of rapid antigen detection assays and a leukocyte esterase dipstick for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in first-void urine specimens from men.

Authors:  M Chernesky; D Jang; J Krepel; J Sellors; J Mahony
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Decision analysis: point-of-care Chlamydia testing vs. laboratory-based methods.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Swain; Roberta A McDonald; John R Pfister; M Stephen Gradus; Gerald V Sedmak; Ajaib Singh
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2004-02

Review 4.  Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  C M Black
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Clinic-based evaluation of Clearview Chlamydia MF for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in vaginal and cervical specimens from women at high risk in China.

Authors:  Y-P Yin; R W Peeling; X-S Chen; K-L Gong; H Zhou; W-M Gu; H-P Zheng; Z-S Wang; G Yong; W-L Cao; M-Q Shi; W-H Wei; X-Q Dai; X Gao; Q Chen; D Mabey
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  Evaluation of Clearview and Magic Lite tests, polymerase chain reaction, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.

Authors:  J A Kluytmans; W H Goessens; J W Mouton; J H van Rijsoort-Vos; H G Niesters; W G Quint; L Habbema; E Stolz; J H Wagenvoort
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection among infertile women in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Remah M Kamel
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2013-06-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.