Literature DB >> 15780366

Evaluation of analgesic requirements and postoperative recovery after radical retropubic prostatectomy using long-acting spinal anesthesia.

Paul D Sved1, Alan M Nieder, Murugesan Manoharan, Pablo Gomez, David S Meinbach, Sandy S Kim, Mark S Soloway.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, and convalescence of patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) under spinal anesthesia using long-acting morphine sulfate as preemptive analgesia.
METHODS: A total of 103 consecutive men underwent RRP by a single surgeon. The time to tolerate oral fluids, time to unassisted ambulation, postoperative pain levels (visual analog pain score of 0 to 10), and analgesic requirements expressed in morphine equivalents were evaluated. Baseline patient characteristics and intraoperative factors (operating room time, blood loss) were also evaluated.
RESULTS: The mean time to tolerate oral fluids and unassisted ambulation was 11.3 +/- 7.6 hours and 20 +/- 6 hours, respectively. The mean narcotic requirements were 7.4 +/- 6.1 morphine equivalents before discharge and 28.5 +/- 25.9 morphine equivalents in the first week after discharge. The mean visual analog pain score was 4.5 +/- 2.1 at discharge and fell significantly to 1.5 +/- 1.0 by the time of Foley catheter removal on postoperative day 7 or 8. The analgesic requirements after discharge correlated with the pain score at discharge (P = 0.016). The mean time to resumption of normal preoperative activities was 19.4 +/- 9.4 days. Two patients developed postspinal anesthesia headache. No other complications attributable to the anesthetic occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: RRP may be performed through a small modified Pfannenstiel incision under spinal anesthesia containing long-acting morphine with little postoperative pain, low narcotic requirements, and a short convalescence. A prospective, randomized study is needed to compare the early postoperative outcomes of RRP performed using general versus spinal anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15780366     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.09.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  4 in total

Review 1.  Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: techniques, outcomes, and cost.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Michael L Blute
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Prospective randomized comparison of the safety, efficacy, and cosmetic outcome associated with mini-transverse and mini-longitudinal radical prostatectomy incisions.

Authors:  Bruce R Kava; Rajinikanth Ayyathurai; Cynthia T Soloway; Miguel Suarez; Prashanth Kanagarajah; Manoharan Murugesan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-07

3.  The impact of spinal anaesthesia on perioperative opioid consumption, postoperative pain and oncological outcome in radical retropubic prostatectomy-a retrospective before-and-after effectiveness study.

Authors:  Sandra Funcke; Xenia Schick-Bengardt; Hans O Pinnschmidt; Burkhard Beyer; Marlene Fischer; Ursula Kahl; Rainer Nitzschke
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-10-03

4.  Pain, psychological distress and health-related quality of life at baseline and 3 months after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Kerstin Wickström Ene; Gunnar Nordberg; Fannie Gaston Johansson; Björn Sjöström
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2006-11-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.