Literature DB >> 15778787

Bad health informatics can kill--is evaluation the answer?

E Ammenwerth, N T Shaw.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Health care is entering the age of information society. It is evident that the use of modern information and communication technology (ICT) offers tremendous opportunities to improve health care. However, there are also hazards associated with ICT in health care. We want to present an overview of typical hazards associated with ICT in health care, and to discuss how ICT evaluation can be a solution.
METHODS: We analyze examples of failures and problems associated with ICT in health care. This collection is also made available on a website. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: Systematic, continuous evaluation of quality and effects of ICT during the whole life cycle of ICT components seems to be one important approach to detect and prevent possible ICT hazards and failures, supporting a higher quality of patient care. However, empirical studies proving this assumption are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15778787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Inf Med        ISSN: 0026-1270            Impact factor:   2.176


  13 in total

1.  A viewpoint on evidence-based health informatics, based on a pilot survey on evaluation studies in health care informatics.

Authors:  Elske Ammenwerth; Nicolette de Keizer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Issues in biomedical research data management and analysis: needs and barriers.

Authors:  Nicholas R Anderson; E Sally Lee; J Scott Brockenbrough; Mark E Minie; Sherrilynne Fuller; James Brinkley; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Improving Evaluation to Address the Unintended Consequences of Health Information Technology:. a Position Paper from the Working Group on Technology Assessment & Quality Development.

Authors:  F Magrabi; E Ammenwerth; H Hyppönen; N de Keizer; P Nykänen; M Rigby; P Scott; J Talmon; A Georgiou
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-11-10

4.  Cancer and the computerized family: towards a clinical ethics of "indirect" Internet use.

Authors:  Christian Simon; Sarah Schramm
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2008-02-19

Review 5.  Clinical information systems in the intensive care unit: primum non nocere.

Authors:  Stephen E Lapinsky
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Evaluating eHealth interventions: the need for continuous systemic evaluation.

Authors:  Lorraine Catwell; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  Use of simulation to assess electronic health record safety in the intensive care unit: a pilot study.

Authors:  Christopher A March; David Steiger; Gretchen Scholl; Vishnu Mohan; William R Hersh; Jeffrey A Gold
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Video observation in HIT development: lessons learned on benefits and challenges.

Authors:  Anna Marie Høstgaard; Pernille Bertelsen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 9.  Design and evaluation in eHealth: challenges and implications for an interdisciplinary field.

Authors:  Claudia Pagliari
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2007-05-27       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  The impact of electronic records on patient safety: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Arabella Clarke; Joy Adamson; Ian Watt; Laura Sheard; Paul Cairns; John Wright
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.