Literature DB >> 15776239

Is there a need for contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI of the spine after inconspicuous short tau inversion recovery imaging?

Andreas H Mahnken1, Joachim E Wildberger, Gerhard Adam, Sven Stanzel, Thomas Schmitz-Rode, Rolf W Günther, Arno Buecker.   

Abstract

To assess the use of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images in comparison with short tau inversion recovery (STIR) images for the detection of vertebral bone marrow abnormalities. A total of 201 vertebral magnetic resonance (MR) examinations were included in a prospective trial. Examinations were performed on a 0.5-T MR scanner. The examination protocol included STIR, T2-weighted turbo spin-echo and T1-weighted spin-echo images before and after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of STIR images were calculated. In the case of abnormal STIR images the additional information from contrast-enhanced images was evaluated using Fisher's exact test. The value of the combined evaluation of STIR and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images was compared with that of the combined assessment of T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. The PPV and the NPV of STIR images for detection of vertebral bone marrow abnormalities were 99.3 and 95.9%. In the case of normal STIR images no relevant additional information was found with contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images, while in the case of abnormal STIR images significant supplementary information was obtained. There was no difference in the diagnostic value when comparing combined assessment of STIR and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images with combined evaluation of T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. Normal STIR images allow contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images for detection of bone marrow abnormalities to be omitted, whereas further imaging is needed in case of abnormal STIR images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15776239     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2719-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  24 in total

1.  Whole-body turbo STIR MR imaging: controversies and avenues for development.

Authors:  Eoin Kavanagh; Clare Smith; Stephen Eustace
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Bone marrow edema pattern in osteoarthritic knees: correlation between MR imaging and histologic findings.

Authors:  M Zanetti; E Bruder; J Romero; J Hodler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Image subtraction in gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  V S Lee; M A Flyer; J C Weinreb; G A Krinsky; N M Rofsky
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Imaging spinal osteomyelitis and epidural abscess with short TI inversion recovery (STIR).

Authors:  R E Bertino; B A Porter; G K Stimac; S J Tepper
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1988 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Microscopic intraosseous extension of osteosarcoma: assessment on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  T Iwasawa; Y Tanaka; N Aida; S Okuzumi; H Nishihira; G Nishimura
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Radiographically occult scaphoid fractures: value of MR imaging in detection.

Authors:  M J Breitenseher; V M Metz; L A Gilula; C Gaebler; C Kukla; D Fleischmann; H Imhof; S Trattnig
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies: assessment with conventional spin-echo, chemical-shift, and STIR MR imaging.

Authors:  L L Baker; S B Goodman; I Perkash; B Lane; D R Enzmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  MR imaging of bone marrow lesions: relative conspicuousness on T1-weighted, fat-suppressed T2-weighted, and STIR images.

Authors:  S A Mirowitz; P Apicella; W R Reinus; A M Hammerman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Detection of multiple myeloma involving the spine: efficacy of fat-suppression and contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  A Rahmouni; M Divine; D Mathieu; M Golli; T H Dao; N Jazaerli; M C Anglade; F Reyes; N Vasile
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Initial experience with FSE STIR whole-body MR imaging for staging lymphoma in children.

Authors:  Christian J Kellenberger; Stephen F Miller; Mustafa Khan; David L Gilday; Sheila Weitzman; Paul S Babyn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  5 in total

1.  Screening for bone metastases: whole-body MRI using a 32-channel system versus dual-modality PET-CT.

Authors:  Gerwin P Schmidt; Stefan O Schoenberg; Rupert Schmid; Robert Stahl; Reinhold Tiling; Christoph R Becker; Maximilian F Reiser; Andrea Baur-Melnyk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Time course of osteoporotic vertebral fractures by magnetic resonance imaging using a simple classification: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Authors:  S Takahashi; M Hoshino; K Takayama; K Iseki; R Sasaoka; T Tsujio; H Yasuda; T Sasaki; F Kanematsu; H Kono; H Toyoda; H Nakamura
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Fast spin echo-T2-weighted sequences with fat saturation in toe dactylitis of spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Ignazio Olivieri; Enrico Scarano; Angela Padula; Salvatore D'Angelo; Carlo Salvarani; Fabrizio Cantini; Laura Niccoli; Libero Barozzi
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of bacterial and tuberculous spondylodiscitis with associated complications and non-infectious spinal pathology mimicking infections: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Yogesh Kumar; Nishant Gupta; Avneesh Chhabra; Takeshi Fukuda; Neetu Soni; Daichi Hayashi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  An international expert opinion statement on the utility of PET/MR for imaging of skeletal metastases.

Authors:  Jad S Husseini; Bárbara Juarez Amorim; Angel Torrado-Carvajal; Vinay Prabhu; David Groshar; Lale Umutlu; Ken Herrmann; Lina García Cañamaque; José Ramón García Garzón; William E Palmer; Pedram Heidari; Tiffany Ting-Fang Shih; Jacob Sosna; Cristina Matushita; Juliano Cerci; Marcelo Queiroz; Valdair Francisco Muglia; Marcello H Nogueira-Barbosa; Ronald J H Borra; Thomas C Kwee; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Laura Evangelista; Marco Salvatore; Alberto Cuocolo; Andrea Soricelli; Christian Herold; Andrea Laghi; Marius Mayerhoefer; Umar Mahmood; Ciprian Catana; Heike E Daldrup-Link; Bruce Rosen; Onofrio A Catalano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.