Literature DB >> 1577523

Occupational dimethylformamide exposure. 1. Diffusive sampling of dimethylformamide vapor for determination of time-weighted average concentration in air.

T Yasugi1, T Kawai, K Mizunuma, S Horiguchi, H Iguchi, M Ikeda.   

Abstract

A diffusive sampling method with water as absorbent was examined in comparison with 3 conventional methods of diffusive sampling with carbon cloth as absorbent, pumping through National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) charcoal tubes, and pumping through NIOSH silica gel tubes to measure time-weighted average concentration of dimethylformamide (DMF). DMF vapors of constant concentrations at 3-110 ppm were generated by bubbling air at constant velocities through liquid DMF followed by dilution with fresh air. Both types of diffusive samplers could either absorb or adsorb DMF in proportion to time (0.25-8 h) and concentration (3-58 ppm), except that the DMF adsorbed was below the measurable amount when carbon cloth samplers were exposed at 3 ppm for less than 1 h. When both diffusive samplers were loaded with DMF and kept in fresh air, the DMF in water samplers stayed unchanged for at least for 12 h. The DMF in carbon cloth samplers showed a decay with a half-time of 14.3 h. When the carbon cloth was taken out immediately after termination of DMF exposure, wrapped in aluminum foil, and kept refrigerated, however, there was no measurable decrease in DMF for at least 3 weeks. When the air was drawn at 0.2 l/min, a breakthrough of the silica gel tube took place at about 4,000 ppm.min (as the lower 95% confidence limit), whereas charcoal tubes could tolerate even heavier exposures, suggesting that both tubes are fit to measure the 8-h time-weighted average of DMF at 10 ppm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1577523     DOI: 10.1007/bf00572110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  15 in total

1.  Occupational dimethylformamide exposure. 3. Health effects of dimethylformamide after occupational exposure at low concentrations.

Authors:  S X Cai; M Y Huang; L Q Xi; Y L Li; J B Qu; T Kawai; T Yasugi; K Mizunuma; T Watanabe; M Ikeda
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  [Determination of N,N-dimethylformamide in air using silica gel tube].

Authors:  T Ashida; S Koike; K Ohmori
Journal:  Sangyo Igaku       Date:  1985-09

3.  Relationship between exposure and environmental concentrations in organic solvent workplaces.

Authors:  H Ukai; S Takada; S Inui; M Ikeda
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Spontaneous desorption of organic solvents from carbon cloth.

Authors:  M Kasahara; M Ikeda
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.179

5.  Applicability of activated carbon felt to the dosimetry of solvent vapor mixture.

Authors:  T Hirayama; M Ikeda
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1979-12

6.  Comparison between personal and stationary sampling results: a field survey in a printing factory.

Authors:  S Takada; T Shinoda; T Ohtsuki; M Miyasaka; A Koizumi; M Ikeda
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 2.151

7.  Relation of exposure to dimethylformamide vapor and the metabolite, methylformamide, in urine of workers.

Authors:  J Yonemoto; S Suzuki
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Liver injury in workers exposed to dimethylformamide.

Authors:  L E Fleming; S L Shalat; C A Redlich
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.024

9.  Subchronic inhalation toxicity of dimethylformamide in rats and mice.

Authors:  D K Craig; R J Weir; W Wagner; D Groth
Journal:  Drug Chem Toxicol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.356

10.  Toxicity of dimethylformamide (DMF) to the young female rat.

Authors:  K I Tanaka
Journal:  Int Arch Arbeitsmed       Date:  1971
View more
  5 in total

1.  Environmental monitoring of occupational exposure to N,N-dimethylformamide: comparison between active and diffusive sampling.

Authors:  Serena Baglioni; Claudia Cassinelli; Grazia Bongini; Isabella Cenni; Nicoletta Graziani; Mauro Landini; Gianni Tanturli; Marek Brabec; Paolo Bavazzano
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Occupational dimethylformamide exposure. 3. Health effects of dimethylformamide after occupational exposure at low concentrations.

Authors:  S X Cai; M Y Huang; L Q Xi; Y L Li; J B Qu; T Kawai; T Yasugi; K Mizunuma; T Watanabe; M Ikeda
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Occupational dimethylformamide exposure. 2. Monomethylformamide excretion in urine after occupational dimethylformamide exposure.

Authors:  T Kawai; T Yasugi; K Mizunuma; T Watanabe; S X Cai; M Y Huang; L Q Xi; J B Qu; B Z Yao; M Ikeda
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Increase in sister chromatid exchange rates in association with occupational exposure to N,N-dimethylformamide.

Authors:  K Seiji; O Inoue; S X Cai; T Kawai; T Watanabe; M Ikeda
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Further examination of log Pow-based procedures to estimate biological occupational exposure limits.

Authors:  Toshio Kawai; Haruhiko Sakurai; Masayuki Ikeda
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 2.708

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.